Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Excise Due Diligence Condition guidance
  • EDDC00500 · Data protection
  • EDDC01000 · General
  • EDDC02000 · The due diligence condition
  • EDDC03000 · Compliance testing
  • EDDC04000 · Risks
  • EDDC05000 · Sanctions
  • EDDC01030 · General: why and when should businesses be carrying out due diligence?
  • EDDC02020 · The due diligence condition: condition in Notices 196, 203A, 204A, 204B and 226
  • EDDC03100 · Compliance visit: risks
  • EDDC03200 · Compliance visit: contrived records
  • EDDC03210 · Compliance visit: VAT implications
  • EDDC03220 · Compliance visit: Human Intelligence source (HumInt)
  • EDDC06000 · Assurance tools
  • EDDC06030 · Assurance tools: Notice of revocation of General Storage and Distribution Warehouse
  • EDDC06040 · Assurance tools: minded to revoke a WOWGR approval
  • EDDC06050 · Assurance tools: trade facility warehouse revocation letter
  1. EDDC02001
  2. The due diligence condition: establishing reasonable and proportionate

EDDC02021 | The due diligence condition: establishing reasonable and proportionate

From HM Revenue & Customs · Excise Due Diligence Condition guidance

Businesses should have reasonable due diligence procedures and checks in place to consider alcohol sector risks before agreeing to trade. When you are considering whether or not these are sufficient, you should interpret ‘reasonable’ objectively. In other words, the procedures and checks are reasonable if they could be perceived by a neutral observer as reasonable.

A proportionately higher level of due diligence testing is required when the revenue risk is higher. For example, where the deal seems too good to be true or supply routes seem contrived or overly long.

PrivacyTerms