Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Appeals reviews and tribunals guidance

ARTG4001 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Contents page

  • ARTG4020 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: The review process
  • ARTG4030 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Review process overview
  • ARTG4040 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Reviewable decisions
  • ARTG4050 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Decisions that are not reviewable
  • ARTG4060 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Aims of the review
  • ARTG4070 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Scope and limitations of the review
  • ARTG4080 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: introduction: role of the review officer
  1. Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Contents page
  2. Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Aims of the review

ARTG4060 | Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Introduction: Aims of the review

From HM Revenue & Customs · Appeals reviews and tribunals guidance

The procedures for dealing with a dispute about a decision or assessment must be transparent, objective and consistent in the way they are applied.

In carrying out a review we have two main aims

  • To take a fresh look at the decision, this may or may not be in the light of new evidence or information (see ARTG4630) but must be done in an objective and balanced way. The review should identify

    • decisions that are wrong or unsound, and

    • decisions that we would not want to take before a tribunal.

  • To help to resolve the dispute, this may not always be possible, but we should consider whether there is scope for negotiations and compromise. Sometimes a dispute can also be resolved by a clearer explanation of our position and the law.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms