Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Appeals reviews and tribunals guidance

ARTG4800 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: Contents page

  • ARTG4810 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: Introduction
  • ARTG4820 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: Action to take
  • ARTG4830 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: HMRC decision upheld or varied
  • ARTG4840 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: HMRC decision cancelled
  • ARTG4850 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: What happens if we do not complete the review within the time limit
  • ARTG4860 · Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: Can the customer ask for a second review
  1. Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: Contents page
  2. Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: HMRC decision cancelled

ARTG4840 | Review of direct and indirect taxes decisions: Conclusion of the review: HMRC decision cancelled

From HM Revenue & Customs · Appeals reviews and tribunals guidance

If the review officer’s conclusion given in their conclusion of review letter is to cancel HMRC’s decision they should note their records.

Any papers should then be returned to the decision maker, who must take appropriate action to give effect to the conclusions of the review.

But if the action needed to give effect to the conclusions of the review can be done quickly and easily they should do this before returning the case papers to the decision maker.

In direct taxes the customer has appealed to HMRC so this will be treated as an agreement under S 54(1) TMA 1970, see ARTG2720 or relevant equivalents.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms