BIM24995 | Meaning of trade: mutual trading and members clubs: tax cases referred to in guidance

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

Alphabetical order by names of the party

The table below identifies the:

  1. principle established

  2. names of the parties

  3. BIM page, and

  4. Tax case reference

for each of the cases referred to in the guidance material on the mutual trading and related issues.

Principle establishedNames of the partiesPageTax case reference
Crucial factor is nature of transactionsAyrshire Employers Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v CIR, 27 TC 331
No need for profit seeking motiveBrighton College v Marriott10 TC 213
Deduction for costs saved by members’ servicesBritish Legion, Peterhead Branch, Remembrance and Welcome Home Fund v CIR, , ,35 TC 509
Distribution by Mutual concern in winding upBrogan v Stafford Coal & Iron Co Ltd, 41 TC 305
Apportionment of expensesCarlisle & Silloth Golf Club v Smith, , , , ,6 TC 48 & 198
‘Not for profit’ does not preclude tradingCIR v Hyndland Investment Co Ltd14 TC 694
Whether tradingCIR v Livingston & Others11 TC 538
Difference between proprietary and members’ clubCIR v Stonehaven Recreation Ground Trustees15 TC 419
Is mutual insurance a trade?CIR v The Cornish Mutual Assurance Co Ltd, , 12 TC 841
Difference between proprietary and members’ clubCIR v The Eccentric Club Ltd12 TC 669
-Dublin Corporation v M’Adam2 TC 387
Bulk buying group trading as principleEnglish & Scottish Joint Co-operative Wholesale Societies Ltd v The Commissioners of Agricultural Income Tax, Assam, 1948 AC 405
Whether tradingErichsen v Last4 TC 422
Contributors may come and goFaulconbridge v National Employers’ Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd, 33 TC 103
Control of a members’ clubFletcher v ITC1972 AC 414
Payments to trade protection associationsGrahamston Iron Co v Crawford7 TC 25
Municipal water supplyHarris v Corporation of the Burgh of Irvine4 TC 221
Destination of profits has no bearing on assessibilityHutchinson & Co (Publishers) Ltd v Turner31 TC 495
Surplus must go back to contributors and no one elseJones v The South West Lancashire Coal Owners’ Association, , 11 TC 790
The practicalities of and Korner v CIR45 TC 287
-Last v The London Assurance Corporation2 TC 100
Effect of shareholdingLiverpool Corn Trade Association Ltd v Monks, 10 TC 442
Payments to trade protection associationsLochgelly Iron and Coal Co Ltd v Crawford6 TC 267
The practicalities of and McLaren v Mumford69 TC 173
What is mutual tradingMunicipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Hills, , , 16 TC 430
Co-operative dividendsPope v Beaumont24 TC 78
Whether tradingRansom v Higgs50 TC 1
Members must control the common fundRevesby Credit Union v The Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia112 CLR 564
Trading is not a question of motiveRoyal Agricultural Society of England v Wilson9 TC 62
The categories of income are exclusiveSalisbury House Estates Ltd v Fry15 TC 266
Can a taxpayer trade with themselvesSharkey v Wernher36 TC 275
Co-operative dividend satisfied by sharesStaffordshire Egg Producers Ltd v Spencer41 TC 131
-Styles v New York Life Insurance Company, , , , , , 2 TC 460
Members’ club only liable on profits from non-membersThe National Association of Local Government Officers v Watkins18 TC 499
Deductibility of trader’s payments to a mutual traderThomas v Richard Evans & Co Ltd11 TC 790
Control of a members’ clubWestbourne Supporters of Glentoran v Brennan, SPC 22
The practicalities of and Wildbore v Luker33 TC 46