Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM37010 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background : what the guidance covers

  • BIM37020 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: what the guidance covers: legislative starting point
  • BIM37025 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: what the guidance covers: expenses rule for employees
  • BIM37030 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: what the guidance covers: tax is charged on the full amount of profits
  • BIM37035 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: the statutory prohibition
  • BIM37045 · Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: appeal to be on a point of law
  1. Wholly and exclusively: statutory background : what the guidance covers: contents
  2. Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: appeal to be on a point of law

BIM37045 | Wholly and exclusively: statutory background: appeal to be on a point of law

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

S11, S13 Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007

Appealing against a First-tier Tribunal decision

Appeals against First-tier Tribunal decisions are to the Upper Tribunal. Appeals against Upper Tribunal decisions are to the relevant appellate court. The relevant appellate court is the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, the Court of Session in Scotland, and the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland.

In both cases appeals may be made with permission and on a point of law. See ARTG8990 for more information.

Where the issue is purely one of fact, the decision in Edwards v Bairstow & Harrison [1955] 36 TC 207 means that the tribunal may only be overturned if it is shown that there was no evidence on which they could have reasonably reached their decision. This means that it is essential that you establish all of the evidence before the tribunal and do not allow the other side to make unchallenged statements as to purpose. The legislation is concerned solely with purpose. This means that the effect of the expenditure is not determinative. But where there is a manifest personal/private benefit to the taxpayer in making the expenditure you should invite the tribunal to infer that this was a purpose of the expenditure.

Previous
PrivacyTerms