Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM38260 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: introduction

  • BIM38265 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: takeover bids: general approach
  • BIM38270 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: nature of company incurring expenditure
  • BIM38275 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: trading companies
  • BIM38280 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: evidence
  • BIM38285 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: group situations
  • BIM38290 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: expenses recharged to trading subsidiaries
  • BIM38295 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: other grounds for disallowance
  • BIM38297 · Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: investment companies
  1. Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: introduction: contents
  2. Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: expenses recharged to trading subsidiaries

BIM38290 | Wholly and exclusively: companies: take-over bids: expenses recharged to trading subsidiaries

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

S54 Corporation Tax Act 2009

Consider the costs in the context of the trade actually conducted

It is important to consider the recharged expenditure in the context of the trade actually carried on by the subsidiary in question.

Is it plausible that the directors’ sole purpose in making the payment was to protect that company’s trade? Is there anything to suggest the trade was more or less threatened than those of other group members?

Only if the directors’ sole purpose was to protect that company’s trade may the payment be allowable.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms