BIM62025 | Measuring the profits (particular trades): Mineral extraction: restoration expenditure
From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual
S335-338 Income Tax (Trade and Other Income) Act 2005, S270-S271 Corporation Tax Act 2009
Where a mining concern makes a payment to a landowner in respect of restoration for surface damage, the tax treatment is as follows:
No deduction is allowable for a lump sum payment in respect of possible future damage, or for payments of such a lump sum in instalments. The lump sum is capital expenditure on the acquisition of a fixed capital asset of the trade (see BIM62030). A provision for such capital expenditure is similarly not an allowable deduction.
Where no such right has been acquired (see BIM62030), a deduction is allowable for a payment of compensation for actually ascertained past damage to another person’s property. A provision for such expenditure is also an allowable deduction, provided it accords with generally accepted accounting practice and is accurately quantified.
No deduction is allowable for payments for the purchase of the surface land and unascertained past damage. Such a payment is capital expenditure on the acquisition of a fixed capital asset. However, where part of the expenditure is payment for actual past damage, and the agreement makes this clear, that element is allowable.
Rent in respect of any land or interest in land used in a mining operation is an allowable deduction (see BIM62035).
The recipient of the rent is chargeable to tax under the above legislation.