Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Leasing Manual

BLM73000 · ’Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded leases: Capital allowances

  • BLM73001 · Introduction
  • BLM73005 · ‘Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded leases: Capital allowances: avoidance of balancing adjustments - 'major lump sum'
  • BLM73010 · Disposal proceeds more than cost of asset
  • BLM73015 · Disposal proceeds less than cost of asset
  • BLM73020 · Disposal proceeds less than cost of asset - a worked example
  • BLM73025 · Double taxation
  • BLM73030 · Variation of lease terms
  • BLM73035 · Restriction on disposal proceeds
  • BLM73040 · Machinery and plant
  • BLM73045 · Industrial buildings allowances
  • BLM73055 · Allowances for costs relating to waste disposal sites and cemeteries
  • BLM73060 · Contributions to lessor's capital expenditure
  • BLM73065 · ’Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded lease: Capital allowances: timing of recovery charge
  1. ’Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded leases: Capital allowances: contents
  2. ’Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded leases: Capital allowances: contributions to lessor's capital expenditure

BLM73060 | ’Income-into-capital’ schemes and back loaded leases: Capital allowances: contributions to lessor's capital expenditure

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Leasing Manual

CTA10/S922 deals with the situation where relief has been given under CAA01/Ss 537 to 542 to a contributor for sums paid to fund a lessor’s expenditure on a leased asset and a major lump sum is receivable in respect of that asset. In those circumstances allowances granted to the lessor are recaptured in the same way and to the same extent as the lessor’s allowances would have been clawed back if they had been entitled to them in the first place.

Without this provision it would have been possible to side-step CTA10/SS717-922 by arranging for, say, another member of the lessor group to claim capital allowances in respect of the lessor’s expenditure rather than the lessor itself. The benefit of those capital allowances would then have been retained even though the lessor’s outlay would have been recouped by means of the major lump sum.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms