Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Leasing Manual

BLM80300 · Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: establishing change of ownership

  • BLM80305 · Qualifying change of ownership
  • BLM80310 · Identifying the principal company - groups
  • BLM80315 · Identifying a qualifying change in ownership
  • BLM80319 · Consortia
  • BLM80338 · Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: entry into tonnage tax
  • BLM80340 · Meaning of 75% or 90% subsidiary etc
  • BLM80350 · Control and companies without share capital
  • BLM80360 · Exceptions to qualifying change of ownership
  • BLM80365 · Exceptions to qualifying change of ownership - consortia
  • BLM80370 · Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: Exceptions to qualifying change of ownership: Election out of charge
  1. Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: establishing change of ownership: contents
  2. Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: establishing change of ownership: control and companies without share capital

BLM80350 | Sale of lessor companies and similar arrangements: establishing change of ownership: control and companies without share capital

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Leasing Manual

CTA2010/S398

Companies without share capital present a risk because they can be used to break a chain of ownership. Companies without share capital can be incorporated within otherwise normal group structures.

The problem is illustrated by the following example.

Use this link to view Example

In this example B Co is a company limited by guarantee. It has no share capital. It holds 100% of the shares in A Ltd, the lessor company. It is not a subsidiary of C Ltd because C Ltd holds no shares in B Co.

Commercially, the relationship between C Ltd and B Co will ensure that C Ltd controls B Co - otherwise D Ltd’s group would lose any profits from A and B. In this example it is assumed that C Ltd holds all the voting rights in B Co and is entitled to all of the distributable profits and the assets on a winding up.

Without special rules B Co is the principal company in relation to A Ltd. The 75% chain cannot continue above B Co.

The sale of B Co would not trigger a charge because there is no change in the relationship between B Co and A Ltd.

The special rules for companies with no share capital change this outcome where there is control for the purposes of section 1124 CTA2010.

If, in this example, C Ltd holds all the voting rights in B Co and is entitled to all of the distributable profits and the assets on a winding up B Co is treated as a 75% subsidiary of C Ltd and the chain continues up to D Ltd which is now the principal company in relation to A Ltd.

With this adjustment the sale of B Co becomes a relevant change in the relationship between A Ltd and its principal company, D Ltd.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms