Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Capital Allowances Manual

CA23200 · PMA: Writing down allowances (WDA) & balancing adjustments

  • CA23210 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Pooling
  • CA23220 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Rate of WDA
  • CA23222 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Hybrid rate of WDA
  • CA23225 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: WDAs for small pools
  • CA23230 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Available qualifying expenditure
  • CA23240 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Disposal events
  • CA23250 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Disposal values
  • CA23260 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: When no disposal value is brought to account
  • CA23270 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Disposal receipt: final chargeable period
  • CA23280 · PMA: WDA & Balancing adjustments: Other provisions about disposal values
  • CA23290 · PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: Disposal of plant subject to lease
  1. PMA: Writing down allowances (WDA) & balancing adjustments: Contents
  2. PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: When no disposal value is brought to account

CA23260 | PMA: WDA & balancing adjustments: When no disposal value is brought to account

From HM Revenue & Customs · Capital Allowances Manual

CAA01/S64

A person does not need to bring a disposal value to account for an asset if no PMAs have been claimed on the qualifying expenditure on it.

There is one exception to this:

  • If a person who incurred qualifying expenditure on an asset acquired it from a connected person or in a series of transactions between connected persons that person has to bring a disposal value to account if anyone in the chain has brought a disposal value to account. This is really an anti-avoidance provision. Without it a person could avoid a balancing charge by transferring an asset on which PMAs have been claimed to a connected person before it was sold. Here is an example.

Example

Sam and Dave are connected. They are both musicians. Sam buys an electric guitar for £15,000 and brings it into use for his business. He decides to get a better one and so he sells the electric guitar to Dave for £7,000. Dave can claim PMAs on the guitar and so Sam’s disposal value is £7,000. Dave then decides to change to an acoustic guitar and so he does not add the expenditure to his pool and sells the electric guitar for £12,000. Dave has to bring a disposal value of £12,000 to account and he can treat the £7,000 as qualifying expenditure. The guitar was bought by Sam for £15,000 and sold by Dave for £12,000 - a net loss of £3,000, which is the overall result. Sam has expenditure £15,000 and disposal proceeds £7,000 while Dave has expenditure of £7,000 and proceeds £12,000.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms