Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Capital Gains Manual

CG65400P · Reliefs: private residence relief: private residence relief on the disposal of settled property

  • CG65400 · Private residence relief: settled property: introduction
  • CG65405 · Private residence relief: settled property: what is settled property?
  • CG65406 · Private residence relief: settled property: express trusts
  • CG65407 · Private residence relief: settled property: entitlement to occupy under the terms of an express trust
  • CG65410 · Private residence relief: settled property: express trusts for minor children
  • CG65415 · Private residence relief: settled property: implied trusts
  • CG65420 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: is there an express trust?
  • CG65421 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: presumption that beneficial ownership follows legal ownership
  • CG65422 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: basic conditions
  • CG65423 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: establishing common intention
  • CG65424 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: common intention must normally exist at the time the property was acquired
  • CG65425 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: look for evidence of an agreement before considering conduct
  • CG65426 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: common intention - practical issues
  • CG65427 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: detriment
  • CG65428 · Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: nature of interest
  • CG65429 · Constructive trusts: other types of constructive trust
  • CG65430 · Constructive trusts: relationship with proprietary estoppel
  • CG65440 · Private residence relief: rules for disposals made on or after 10 December 2003: trustees
  • CG65441 · Restriction of private residence relief: trustees: claim for gift hold-over relief made on or before claim for private residence relief
  • CG65442 · Restriction of private residence relief: trustees: claim for gift hold-over relief made after claim for private residence relief
  • CG65443 · Restriction of private residence relief: trustees: claim for gift hold-over relief is revoked
  • CG65444 · Restriction of private residence relief: trustees: transitional rules: FA2004 Sch22 Para 8
  • CG65445 · Private residence relief: settled property: disposals on or after 10 December 2003: property affected by claim for gift hold-over relief: example
  • CG65446 · Private residence relief: settled property: disposals on or after 10 December 2003: transitional provisions: example
  • CG65447 · Private residence relief: settled property: disposals on or after 10 December 2003: settlements for the maintenance of historic buildings - exception to the general rules
  • CG65450 · Private residence relief: settled property: notice by trustees
  • CG65451 · Private residence relief: settled property: religious communities
  • CG65460 · Private residence relief: personal representatives
  1. Reliefs: private residence relief: private residence relief on the disposal of settled property: contents
  2. Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: detriment

CG65427 | Private residence relief: settled property: common intention constructive trusts: detriment

From HM Revenue & Customs · Capital Gains Manual

TCGA92/S225

Having established that there was a common intention to give the occupier an interest in the property the occupier must have acted to his or her detriment in reliance on that agreement. It is the detrimental reliance which makes it unconscionable for the legal owner to deny the beneficiary an interest in the land.

Direct financial contributions to the purchase price or the payment of mortgage instalments would be evidence of detriment but may be unlikely in the case of claims under TCGA92/S225. It is more likely that the occupier would have to show a significant change in his or her position in reliance on the common intention. This means that the occupier must have done something which he or she could not reasonably be expected to have done unless they were to have an interest in the property. For example, they may have given up their right to occupy another property or to buy it at a discounted price. They may have given up a job and moved to another part of the country maybe to assist a disabled relative.

The detriment has to be significant. A person who sells his or her own house and keeps the sale proceeds has not acted to their detriment if they move into a house owned by another person. Any detriment has to be balanced against any benefit received such as being allowed to occupy the property rent free. Merely maintaining and insuring the property would not be evidence of detriment; paying for significant improvements may be.

For example, a nephew may agree to provide a flat for his elderly uncle and aunt. They sell their property and use the proceeds to pay for medical expenses. There is a common intention that the uncle and aunt should occupy the property for their lives or until they do not need it. But there is no constructive trust because the uncle and aunt have not acted to their detriment in reliance on the common intention. They have been allowed to occupy the property rent-free and keep the disposal proceeds of their own property.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms