Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Compliance Handbook

CH73000 · Penalties for Failure to Notify: Calculating the penalty: Penalty reductions for quality of disclosure

  • CH73100 · Introduction
  • CH73120 · Unprompted and prompted disclosure
  • CH73140 · Determining unprompted or prompted disclosure
  • CH73160 · Examples of unprompted or prompted disclosure
  • CH73180 · Non-deliberate failure disclosed within 12 months
  • CH73200 · Maximum and minimum penalties for each type of behaviour
  • CH73220 · Quality of disclosure
  • CH73240 · Determining the quality of disclosure
  • CH73260 · Determining the quality of disclosure - Examples
  • CH73300 · Telling
  • CH73320 · Helping
  • CH73340 · Giving access
  • CH73360 · Timing of the disclosure
  • CH73210 · Penalties for failure to notify: calculating the penalty: penalty reductions for disclosure: maximum and minimum penalties for failure to notify involving an offshore matter and income tax or capital gains tax
  1. Penalties for Failure to Notify: Calculating the penalty: Penalty reductions for quality of disclosure: contents
  2. Penalties for Failure to Notify: Calculating the penalty: Penalty reductions for quality of disclosure: Quality of disclosure

CH73220 | Penalties for Failure to Notify: Calculating the penalty: Penalty reductions for quality of disclosure: Quality of disclosure

From HM Revenue & Customs · Compliance Handbook

The maximum penalty percentage is reduced by an amount that represents the quality of disclosure.

The more a person tells, helps or gives access to us, the more the penalty will be reduced.

The term ‘reduction for disclosure’ replaces the terms ‘abatement’ and ‘mitigation’ used in previous penalty regimes.

To calculate the reduction for disclosure you need to consider the three elements of disclosure,

  • telling us about it, see CH73300

  • giving us reasonable help, see CH73320

  • allowing us access to records, see CH73340.

Where a person has taken a significant period to correct their non-compliance in relation to either an onshore or offshore matter, or they would previously have been able to make a disclosure through one of HMRC’s offshore disclosure facilities, they can no longer expect HMRC to give them the full reduction for the quality of disclosure. A ‘significant period‘ is normally considered to be over 3 years but may be less where the overall disclosure covers a longer period.

If you consider that this may apply to your case, see CH73360 for further guidance.

When calculating the amount of the penalty for any year, you will also need to establish whether the error falls within category 1, 2 or 3, see CH112400.

As a guide you may weight the elements of disclosure as follows:

Element of disclosurePercentage
Telling30%
Helping40%
Giving access30%
Total100%

Where a person has taken a significant period to correct their non-compliance, or, they would previously have been able to make their disclosure through one of HMRC’s offshore facilities they can no longer expect HMRC to agree full reduction for disclosure. In such cases it is unlikely that HMRC would reduce the penalty more than 10 percentage points above the minimum of the statutory range. For this purpose we would normally consider a ‘significant period’ to be over three years or less where the overall disclosure covers a longer period.

For guidance on how to determine the quality of disclosure, see CH73240.

For examples, see CH73260.

FA08/SCH41/PARA12 (2) & (4)

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms