Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Corporate Finance Manual

CFM73000 · Other tax rules on corporate finance: structured finance

  • CFM73010 · Overview
  • CFM73020 · Avoidance background
  • CFM73030 · Avoidance background: examples
  • CFM73040 · CTA10/Part 16 Factoring of income etc
  • CFM73050 · Definitions
  • CFM73060 · Conditions for section 758
  • CFM73070 · Connected persons
  • CFM73080 · Partnership borrowers
  • CFM73090 · The relevant effects
  • CFM73100 · The first two relevant effects
  • CFM73110 · The third relevant effect
  • CFM73120 · The third relevant effect: example
  • CFM73130 · Partnership borrower and the relevant effect
  • CFM73140 · Summary of the relevant effects
  • CFM73150 · Consequences for the lender
  • CFM73160 · Finance charges
  • CFM73170 · The complex partnership case
  • CFM73180 · Sections 763 to 769
  • CFM73190 · Condition A cases
  • CFM73200 · Condition B cases
  • CFM73210 · Relevant change for Condition A and B cases
  • CFM73220 · Tax treatment of a complex case
  • CFM73230 · Reversal of a relevant effect in a complex case
  • CFM73240 · Partnership finance charges
  • CFM73250 · Exceptions
  • CFM73260 · Section 785A and sections 758 to 769
  • CFM73270 · Exclusions from Sections759 and 765
  • CFM73280 · Accounting practice and accounts
  • CFM73290 · Commencement and transition
  • CFM73300 · Capital gains tax
  1. Other tax rules on corporate finance: structured finance: contents
  2. Other tax rules on corporate finance: structured finance: exceptions

CFM73250 | Other tax rules on corporate finance: structured finance: exceptions

From HM Revenue & Customs · Corporate Finance Manual

Section 765 exceptions

Section 770 CFM73100, provides that the charging provision and the relieving provisions are subject to the exceptions in section 771 (see below and CFM73250.

The first in section 771 (1) disapplies the relevant effect and deductibility rules in 759 or 765 if the whole of the advance is

  • charged to tax as an amount of income or

  • brought into account in computing income.

CFM73100 explains the distinction between the two.

The effect of this rule is that where the whole of the advance is taxed as income in the case of a relevant person it is not necessary to consider the relevant effect rules in section 759 and 765. In the unlikely case that the advance is only partly brought into account as income then there will be a relevant effect only in relation to the amount of income that will now escape tax.

Example

A sells to B an income producing asset for 100. The asset will produce 105 of income over the next 12 months after which it will be transferred back to A. A records a financial liability of 100 in respect of the advance and will also record a finance charge of 5 reflecting the implicit interest. All of the conditions in section 758 are satisfied.

If all 100 of the advance were charged to tax as income then section 771 (1) would prevent section 759 from applying.

If 60 of the advance were charged as income then there would be a relevant effect only in relation to the 45 that would not now be charged as income. Accordingly A would be charged to tax on the 45 under section 759 but would be allowed relief for the finance charge of 5 recorded in the accounts.

In practice, if part only of the advance is charged as income, HMRC staff should be willing to accept such computations as produce a just and reasonable result.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms