CIRD45050 | Intangible assets: related party rules: licence not granted at market value
From HM Revenue & Customs · Corporate Intangibles Research and Development Manual
CTA09/S849AB and AD for periods from 1 January 2026
A market value adjustment only needs to be considered when
the grant does not fall to be adjusted for transfer pricing (CTA09/S849AB(1A)(a)(i)), or
the grant is one which would have not been subject to transfer pricing (CTA09/S849AB(1A)(a)(ii)),
and when either
• a company grants a licence or other right in respect of an intangible fixed asset to a related party at less than market value (CTA09/S849AB(2)), or
• a company is granted a licence or other right in respect of an intangible fixed asset by a related party at above market value (CTA09/S849AB(3)).
Where those conditions are met, CTA09/S849AB(2)–(3) provides for a market value adjustment to be made to remove the tax advantage.
CTA09/S849AB is subject to S849AD.
Where CTA09/S849AB does not apply, because the grant falls to be adjusted for transfer pricing (CTA09/S849AB(1A)(a)(i)), the arm’s-length principle will apply to determine the value. FA26/S47 inserted subsection (3) into TIOPA10/S151 with effect from 1 January 2026 to ensure the cash equivalent is brought into account for the purposes of CTA09/PART8.
Note that the one-way street applies to related party licences. This means the provisions only make an adjustment to remove a tax advantage. That adjustment will either be made by TIOPA10/PART4 or under CTA09/S849AB depending on whether the transaction is cross-border (see below).
CT09/S849AD
The application of the market value rule is modified in relation to grants involving other taxes (CTA09/S849AD). It does not apply to grants giving rise to a distribution or employment income charge on any person under CTA10/PART23 (distributions) or Part 3 of ITEPA (employment income). This replicates the rules in CTA09/S847 for transfers (see CIRD45033).
Definition of cross-border (CTA09/S849AB(1B) – (1F))
CTA09/S849AB(1B) defines cross-border grant by reference to two broad situations, those situations are where the related party is either
a UK resident company with a qualifying permanent establishment outside the UK (CTA09/S849AB(1B)(a)), or
a non-UK resident company, individual or firm, except where the non-UK resident company, individual or firm has a permanent establishment in the UK with a relevant connection to the licence or other right that is subject to the grant (CTA09/S849AB(1B)(b) – (d)).
CTA09/S849AB(1C) defines ‘qualifying’ in relation to a related party’s permanent establishment outside the UK. Broadly, ‘qualifying’ means
an election under CTA09/S18(1) (exemption for profits or losses of foreign permanent establishments) has been made requiring adjustment to be made to the taxable profits, and
those adjustments include adjustment in respect of the licence or other right that is subject to the grant.
CTA09/S849AB(1D) defines ‘relevant connection’ in relation to the granted asset by reference to Chapter 4 or Part 2 as one that can be attributed to that permanent establishment.
CTA09/S849AB(1E) defines ‘relevant connection’ in relation to a branch or agency in relation to the granted asset.
CTA09/S849AB(1F) defines ‘branch or agency’.
CTA09/S849AB(12) defines “actual provision” and “arm’s length provision”.
For periods before 1 January 2026
For periods from 22 November 2017 to 31 December 2025 see CIRD48350.
For periods before 22 November 2017 CTA09/PART8 did not have a specific rule for related party licences. Other provisions such as transfer pricing and anti-avoidance provisions should be considered to counter any abuse to gain a tax advantage.