Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Employment Income Manual

EIM33000 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: introduction and table of contents

  • EIM33001 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: general conditions
  • EIM33002 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: calculating the deduction
  • EIM33003 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: example of eligible period straddling tax years
  • EIM33004 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: meaning of eligible period
  • EIM33005 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: how to approach the calculation of an eligible period
  • EIM33006 · Seafarers Earnings Deduction: example of eligible period
  • EIM33007 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: days of absence from the United Kingdom
  • EIM33010 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: entitlement to the deduction for non-UK resident seafarers: 2011 to 2012 onwards
  • EIM33011 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: entitlement to the deduction for non-UK resident seafarers: years prior to 2011/12: introduction
  • EIM33012 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: entitlement to the deduction for non-UK resident seafarers: years prior to 2011/12: how to claim
  • EIM33013 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: entitlement to the deduction for non-UK resident seafarers: years prior to 2011/12: supporting evidence required
  • EIM33014 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: entitlement to the deduction for non-UK resident seafarers: years prior to 2011/12: time limits for claims
  • EIM33021 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: the year the deduction is given
  • EIM33031 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: meaning of duties performed wholly or partly outside the United Kingdom
  • EIM33032 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: meaning of United Kingdom
  • EIM33033 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: location of duties performed on a ship
  • EIM33034 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: location of duties performed on ships visiting oil and gas rigs
  • EIM33035 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: Crown servants
  • EIM33051 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: attribution of earnings: example
  • EIM33052 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: attribution of earnings: terminal leave pay
  • EIM33053 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: attribution of earnings: effect of other deductions
  • EIM33061 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: treatment of periods of non- residence and terminal leave pay
  • EIM33062 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: Statement of Practice 18/1991
  • EIM33063 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: when periods of non-residence begin and end
  • EIM33064 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: example of the effect of Extra-Statutory Concession A11
  • EIM33070 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: anti-avoidance legislation: introduction
  • EIM33071 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: anti-avoidance legislation: associated employments
  • EIM33072 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: anti avoidance legislation: eligible period that straddles tax years
  • EIM33081 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: how to claim and give the deduction
  • EIM33082 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: verification of dates of absence
  • EIM33101 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: meaning of employment as a seafarer
  • EIM33102 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: meaning of offshore installation before 6 April 2004
  • EIM33103 · Seafarers' Earnings Deduction: meaning of offshore installation: 2004/05 onwards
  • EIM33104 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: years up to and including 2007 to 2008: examples
  • EIM33105 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: tax year 2008 to 2009 onwards: the effect of the decisions in Torr (PSA) and Spowage (Prosafe)
  • EIM33106 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: 2008/09 onwards: the meaning of “exploiting mineral resources by means of a well”
  • EIM33107 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: dual or multi-use vessels
  • EIM33108 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: standing or stationed in any waters: dynamic positioning
  • EIM33109 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: standing or stationed in any waters: duration of stay at work location
  • EIM33110 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: CIR v Langley
  • EIM33111 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: Torr and Others v CIR (Pride of South America)
  • EIM33112 · Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: Spowage and Others v CIR (Prosafe vessels)
  1. Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: introduction and table of contents
  2. Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: CIR v Langley

EIM33110 | Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction: offshore installations and ships: CIR v Langley

From HM Revenue & Customs · Employment Income Manual

Section 1001 ITA 2007

Two Special Commissioners’ decisions published in late 2007 and early 2008 and a decision of the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax) published in June 2009, provide useful guidance in relation to the meaning of “offshore installation” in the context of Seafarers’ Earnings Deduction (SED). Details concerning Torr and Others v CIR are at EIM33111 and at EIM33112 for details relating to the case of Spowage and Others v CIR.

Commissioners’ decisions do not establish a legal precedent but in the absence of a decision of the Courts on similar facts, a decision by the Special Commissioners may be regarded as an useful indicator of the way in which the Courts might interpret the legislation.

CIR v Langley (SpC00642)

This decision was published in October 2007.

Between 1999 - 2004 the appellant carried out duties on a self propelled oil drilling rig. In that period the rig was constructed in a shipyard in France and subsequently underwent sea trials, before moving to its first working site off Egypt, where it commenced a period of drilling for oil. Finally it was renovated whilst there was no immediate contract for further drilling.

The appellant argued that once the vessel was floated from the dry dock in the shipyard it became a ship, as it was capable of navigation (it could not power itself at this point). The appellant also contended that this status continued throughout its sea trials and when it was in transit to its first drilling site. Once drilling commenced the appellant accepted that it became an offshore installation.

The Special Commissioner decided that the rig was a structure which was to be used while standing in any waters for the purpose of exploitation of mineral resources by means of a well. As its sole use once in operation was to perform a relevant use (see EIM33103) it was intended to be put to this use from the outset of its construction. Consequently the vessel was an offshore installation, and therefore precluded from being a ship, for the entire period of its construction, sea trials, transit to drilling site and drilling operations, until it was taken out of use for refurbishment.

During the refit it was not put to a relevant use and, as it was otherwise capable of movement across water, it became a ship for the purposes of SED.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms