Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Enquiry Manual

EM2100 · Working the Enquiry: Tax Cases

  • EM2101 · G Deacon & Sons v Roper 33TC66
  • EM2102 · Horowitz v Farrand 33TC221
  • EM2103 · Moschi v Kelly (and v CIR) 33TC442
  • EM2104 · Kilburn v Bedford 36TC262
  • EM2105 · Roberts v McGregor 38TC610
  • EM2106 · Chuwen v Sabine 39TC1
  • EM2107 · Hellier v O'Hare 42TC155
  • EM2108 · Woodrow (Executor of Charles D Woodrow) v Whalley 42TC249
  • EM2109 · Brimelow v Price 49TC41
  • EM2110 · Yoannou v Hall 53TC32
  • EM2115 · Rea v Highnam 63TC287
  1. Working the Enquiry: Tax Cases: Contents
  2. Working the Enquiry: Tax Cases: Yoannou v Hall 53TC32

EM2110 | Working the Enquiry: Tax Cases: Yoannou v Hall 53TC32

From HM Revenue & Customs · Enquiry Manual

Personal and private expenditure was alleged to have been met by £10,000 brought to the United Kingdom from Cyprus in 1954, by a loan of £3,000 from a friend who did not require repayment, from Social Security benefits and `a little money here and there’. The General Commissioners did not accept these explanations and determined assessments on furnished lettings in favour of the Revenue.

The decision was upheld in the High Court, where Fox, J, said

‘The Commissioners, it seems to me, were perfectly entitled to come to the conclusion that somebody who has had no national assistance since the late 1950s, who says he brought £10,000 into this country and that he had also been assisted in living by a loan of £3,000 from somebody who does not want it back, and who says that various persons living on his premises from whom payments were received were not tenants but just friends and relations, had not satisfied them that he was overcharged.’.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms