EAIG13200 | Best judgement: what it means

The meaning of the phrase ‘to the best of their judgement’ and principles inherent in HMRC requirement to exercise best judgement were considered in a VAT High Court ruling given by Woolf J, as he was then, in the appeal case Van Boeckel v C & E QB Dec 1980, [1981] STC 290.

The case set the benchmark for best judgement. In summary, the principles adopted in Van Boeckel are that

• HMRC should not be required to do the work of the taxpayer

• HMRC must perform their function honestly and above-board

• HMRC should fairly consider all the material before them and on that material, come to a decision which is reasonable and not arbitrary, and

• there must be some material before HMRC on which they can base their judgement.

The basic principles have been refined in a number of other cases. In the case of CA McCourtie LON/92/191 the tribunal considered the principles set out in Van Boeckel and put forward three further propositions

• the facts should be objectively gathered and intelligently interpreted

• the calculations should be arithmetically sound, and

• any sampling technique should be representative.