Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Insurance Policyholder Taxation Manual

IPTM8100 · Qualifying policies: variations, substitutions and options

  • IPTM8105 · Variations, substitutions and options: introduction
  • IPTM8110 · Substitutions: circumstances in which they arise
  • IPTM8115 · Substitutions: pre-25 February 1988 policies
  • IPTM8120 · Substitution of a qualifying policy: test of whether the new policy also qualifies
  • IPTM8125 · Substitution of a qualifying policy: within ten years of the old policy being made: whether new policy qualifies
  • IPTM8130 · Substitution of a qualifying policy that has run for at least ten years: whether new policy qualifies
  • IPTM8135 · Substitution of a foreign policy by a UK policy: test of whether new policy qualifies: ICTA88/SCH15/PARA25
  • IPTM8140 · Premium paid out of sums due under previous qualifying policies: test of whether new policy qualifies
  • IPTM8145 · Significant variation: how and when variations occur
  • IPTM8150 · Significant variations: examples
  • IPTM8155 · Significant variation: certain variations not treated as significant: ICTA88/SCH15/PARA18
  • IPTM8160 · Insignificant variations
  • IPTM8165 · Significant variation of a qualifying policy: tests for whether policy after variation qualifies: general test: ICTA88/SCH15/PARA18
  • IPTM8170 · Significant variation of a qualifying policy: tests for whether policy after variation qualifies: application: ICTA88/SCH15/PARA18
  • IPTM8175 · Options in policies: qualifying tests: ICTA88/SCH15/PARA19
  • IPTM8180 · Options: peppercorn options
  • IPTM8185 · Options: deposit options
  • IPTM8190 · Policy review clauses: general principles
  • IPTM8195 · Policy review clauses: advisory premium reviews
  • IPTM8200 · Policy review clauses: mandatory premium reviews
  • IPTM8205 · Policy review clauses: example of advisory and mandatory premium reviews
  • IPTM8210 · Conversion of a policy to paid-up under the terms of the policy
  • IPTM8215 · Non-contractual conversion of a policy to paid-up
  1. Qualifying policies: variations, substitutions and options: contents
  2. Options: deposit options

IPTM8185 | Options: deposit options

From HM Revenue & Customs · Insurance Policyholder Taxation Manual

A ‘deposit option’ (or ‘reinvestment option’) is an option under which the policyholder can choose to pay no more premiums once the policy has run for over ten years. Exercise of the option substitutes a whole of life policy. All or part of the policy value would be held ‘on deposit’ in the new policy with the policyholder having the facility to make part surrenders of the policy.

Option in the policy

In testing at the outset whether the policy qualifies the effect of exercising any of the options in the policy must be considered. A policy containing a deposit option cannot be qualifying as explained below.

Substitution

If the deposit option were exercised, it would give rise to a new policy on substitution. The new policy would fail the conditions to be qualifying as a stand-alone policy, because no regular premiums are payable under it.

The new policy would not qualify under the protection given by ICTA88/SCH15/PARA17(2)(c) unless the transfer value from the old policy applied as premium to the new policy was nil or very small, which is not likely to be the case. This is because in applying the test, the premium of the new policy relating to the transfer value must be included, and it will almost certainly exceed the smallest total of premiums paid in any 12 month period under the old policy.

It would, however, still qualify if it meets the conditions in ICTA88/SCH15/PARA15, which applies where premium in a new policy is met from the proceeds of an old policy that has run for more than ten years and the proceeds are retained by the insurer - see IPTM8140. This rule allows the new policy to qualify if the only breaches of the basic qualifying policy tests are the requirements for payment of regular premiums and to meet the premium spreading tests described in IPTM8055.

Significant variation

The new policy following the exercise of the deposit option would, however, fail to qualify if there is a part surrender within ten years for the same reasons as for policies with a peppercorn option. The premium paid under the new policy that relates to the transfer value from the old policy would mean that the test in ICTA88/SCH15/PARA17(2)(b), described at IPTM8170, could not be met.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms