Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Insurance Premium Tax

IPT06800 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: contents

  • IPT06810 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: purpose and outline of this section
  • IPT06820 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: legal basis for the registration of certain taxable intermediaries
  • IPT06830 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: criteria for registration
  • IPT06840 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: examples of how an intermediary could become registered
  • IPT06850 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: apportionment and de minimis
  • IPT06860 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: registration limits and procedure
  • IPT06870 · Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: other information
  1. Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: contents
  2. Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: apportionment and de minimis

IPT06850 | Maintaining the IPT Register: registration of taxable intermediaries: apportionment and de minimis

From HM Revenue & Customs · Insurance Premium Tax

Section 52A(4) of the Finance Act 1994, inserted by the Finance Act 1997, states that, for the purposes of taxable intermediaries and their fees, a contract is a higher rate contract if:

(a) it is a taxable insurance contract; and

(b) the whole or any part of a premium received under the contract by the insurer is ….liable to tax at the higher rate.

Thus any fee which relates to a contract liable to IPT at the standard and higher rate, and which meets the conditions set out in paragraph IPT06840, will be liable to IPT at 20% (or 17.5% if the tax point falls before the 4 January 2011) in its entirety. There is no scope for apportionment on the grounds that the fee relates to a ‘mixed’ contract and there are no de minimis provisions.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms