Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
International Manual

INTM489585 · Diverted Profits Tax: application of Diverted Profits Tax: legislation – Finance Act 2015 – core provisions

  • INTM489590 · Overview of Diverted Profits Tax
  • INTM489595 · Section 80 - involvement of entities or transactions lacking economic substance - situation 1 - UK company
  • INTM489600 · Transaction or series of transactions
  • INTM489605 · Section 80 exceptions – excepted loan relationship outcome
  • INTM489610 · Section 80 exceptions – small or medium sized enterprises (SMEs)
  • INTM489615 · Application to partnerships
  • INTM489620 · Section 81 - involvement of entities or transactions lacking economic substance - extension to foreign companies with a UK permanent establishment
  • INTM489625 · Consequences of section 80 or 81 applying
  • INTM489630 · Consequences of section 80 or 81 applying - section 82 - key definitions
  • INTM489635 · Consequences of section 80 or 81 applying - section 83 - cases where no taxable diverted profits arise
  • INTM489640 · Consequences of section 80 or 81 applying - section 84 - calculation by reference to the actual provision
  • INTM489645 · Consequences of section 80 or 81 applying - section 85 - calculation by reference to the relevant alternative provision
  • INTM489650 · Estimating profits for notices – section 80 or 81 cases
  • INTM489655 · Section 86 - avoidance of a UK taxable presence – situation 3
  • INTM489660 · Section 86 exceptions – independent agents, etc.
  • INTM489665 · Section 86 exceptions – companies with limited UK related sales or expenses
  • INTM489670 · Section 86 exceptions – SMEs
  • INTM489675 · Section 86 – the mismatch condition
  • INTM489680 · Section 86 – the tax avoidance condition
  • INTM489685 · Section 86 – application to partnerships
  • INTM489690 · Section 87 - exception for limited UK-related sales or expenses
  • INTM489695 · Consequences of section 86 applying
  • INTM489700 · Consequences of section 86 applying - section 88 - key definitions
  • INTM489705 · Consequences of section 86 applying - section 89 - calculation of profits where only tax avoidance condition is met
  • INTM489710 · Consequences of section 86 applying - section 90 - mismatch condition is met - calculation by reference to the actual provision
  • INTM489715 · Consequences of section 86 applying - section 91 - mismatch condition is met - calculation by reference to the relevant alternative provision
  • INTM489720 · Estimating profits for notices - section 86 cases
  • INTM489725 · The participation condition
  • INTM489730 · The participation condition A - financing arrangements
  • INTM489735 · The participation condition B - non-financing arrangements
  • INTM489740 · The effective tax mismatch outcome
  • INTM489745 · The effective tax mismatch outcome – reduction in the income of the first party
  • INTM489750 · The effective tax mismatch outcome – exempted payments
  • INTM489755 · The effective tax mismatch outcome – 80% payment test
  • INTM489760 · The effective tax mismatch outcome - quantifying the tax reduction
  • INTM489765 · The insufficient economic substance condition – overview
  • INTM489770 · The insufficient economic substance condition – detail
  • INTM489775 · Partnerships
  1. Diverted Profits Tax: application of Diverted Profits Tax: legislation – Finance Act 2015 – core provisions: contents
  2. Diverted Profits Tax: application of Diverted Profits Tax: legislation – Finance Act 2015 – core provisions: section 80 exceptions – excepted loan relationship outcome

INTM489605 | Diverted Profits Tax: application of Diverted Profits Tax: legislation – Finance Act 2015 – core provisions: section 80 exceptions – excepted loan relationship outcome

From HM Revenue & Customs · International Manual

An effective tax mismatch outcome is an excepted loan relationship outcome if it arises wholly from either:

  • anything that would produce debits or credits under Part 5 of CTA 2009 if a party to it was within the charge to corporation tax, or

  • a loan relationship and a derivative contract entered into entirely as a hedge of risk in connection with the loan relationship.

The existence of a loan relationship, or loan relationships, within the material provision that gives rise to an effective tax mismatch outcome does not of course automatically mean that the outcome is excepted. It must arise wholly from the loan relationship(s) and/or hedging contract.

Example: Excepted loan relationship rule

Company A is a UK resident company that has a group financing subsidiary resident in a low tax territory. The group financing company is a Controlled Foreign Company within the finance company partial exemption rules.

Company Z (a non-UK resident company in the same group as Company A) requires debt funding for the purposes of its trade. For the last two years Company A has provided this funding through a long-term loan, but now arranges to terminate the loan early and injects equity into the group financing company which then on lends the funds to Company Z.

Provision has been made or imposed as between Company A and the group finance company, which is effectively given the opportunity to lend its capital to Company Z. There is an effective tax mismatch outcome on the basis that there is a reduction in A’s taxable income giving a reduction in the amount of corporation tax payable that we assume here exceeds the resulting increase in relevant taxes payable by the group finance company. However, this tax mismatch outcome arises wholly from a matter (that is, the intragroup loan) that is within the excepted loan relationship rule. Hence, the excepted loan relationship outcome rule means that this arrangement is not within scope of DPT.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms