Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Litigation and Settlement Strategy

LSS30000 · Handling a dispute: content

  • LSS30100 · Handling a dispute: Overview
  • LSS30200 · Handling a dispute: Working collaboratively
  • LSS30300 · Handling a dispute: Setting out the points in dispute
  • LSS30400 · Handling a dispute: Agreeing timescales
  • LSS30500 · Handling a dispute: Establishing the facts
  • LSS30600 · Handling a dispute: Seeking specialist advice
  • LSS30700 · Handling a dispute: Sharing and testing views
  • LSS30800 · Handling a dispute: Legal Professional Privilege
  • LSS30900 · Handling a dispute: Where a collaborative approach is not possible or appropriate
  1. Handling a dispute: content
  2. Handling a dispute: Working collaboratively

LSS30200 | Handling a dispute: Working collaboratively

From HM Revenue & Customs · Litigation and Settlement Strategy

You should always aim to work in a collaborative, non-confrontational way when handling a dispute.

Working collaboratively means that:

  • you should try to avoid a dispute by explaining the risks and how documents and information can address the risk

  • if you recognise that you have a different view from the customer, you should inform the customer so that you are both aware there is a dispute and that it needs to be resolved

  • you should act to resolve the issue and explain how you intend to resolve it

Collaborative working might include, for example:

  • discussing transactions or issues on a real time basis (pre-transaction or pre-return)

  • holding an open dialogue that sets out the specific task risk identified and avoids unnecessarily wide-ranging opening enquiries

  • early discussion of the disputed issue to understand what relevant facts are needed and which law will apply to those facts

  • agreeing a timetable with milestones and target dates for:

    • establishing facts

    • providing information or documentation

    • reviewing documentation

    • reaching decisions

    • testing conclusions

    • providing updates on progress

    • clarifying understanding of relevant facts

    • agreeing the form in which information is to be provided

  • discussing, sharing and testing technical arguments to assess relevant strengths and weaknesses in analysis

  • agreeing the key questions to be answered in order to resolve the dispute

  • exploring possible alternative interpretations of the facts or law

  • working with the person or their agent to agree revised figures or required action

Even where a dispute seems to have reached an impasse, it may still be possible for you to work with the person or their agent. For example, if a matter is heading towards litigation, you can still:

  • agree the key question or questions that need to be determined by the tribunal or courts

  • seek to narrow down the points in dispute

  • jointly draft an agreed statement of facts

  • consider Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involving a third-party facilitator, see ADRG01000 and use Alternative Dispute Resolution to settle a tax dispute

  • be open to discussing the relevance or impact of any new facts that come to light or alternative technical arguments that are identified

  • agree a timetable for the preparatory steps to litigation

  • arrange periodic meetings to discuss the case and give or receive updates on progress

A collaborative approach may not be possible or appropriate in all cases, see LSS30900.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms