Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
National Insurance Manual

NIM05707 · Class 1 NICs: Expenses and Allowances: Mileage allowances: Rules before 6 April 2002

  • NIM05708 · Liability for Class 1 NICs
  • NIM05710 · Calculating Class 1 NICs on mileage allowances
  • NIM05715 · Use of HMRC's Authorised Mileage Rates
  • NIM05716 · Rates paid are at or below the authorised rates
  • NIM05718 · Rates paid are greater than authorised rates - employer claims no profit included
  • NIM05719 · Calculating Class 1 NICs on mileage allowances - examples
  • NIM05720 · General treatment of lump sum payments
  • NIM05721 · Lump sum payments - Calculating Class 1 NICs on lump sum payments
  • NIM05725 · Employer restricts the amount of business mileage paid
  • NIM05730 · Employer restricts the amount of business mileage paid - examples
  • NIM05735 · Motorcycle rates
  • NIM05736 · Cycle rates
  • NIM05737 · Passenger and/or equipment rates
  • NIM05740 · Local Authority essential and casual car users
  • NIM05745 · Class 1 NICs: Expenses and Allowances: Mileage allowances: Rules before 6 April 2002: Health Authority regular and standard car users
  • NIM05750 · Civic dignitaries
  • NIM05755 · Methodist Ministers
  1. Class 1 NICs: Expenses and Allowances: Mileage allowances: Rules before 6 April 2002: Contents
  2. Class 1 NICs: Expenses and allowances: Mileage allowances: Rules before 6 April 2002: Rates paid are greater than authorised rates - employer claims no profit included

NIM05718 | Class 1 NICs: Expenses and allowances: Mileage allowances: Rules before 6 April 2002: Rates paid are greater than authorised rates - employer claims no profit included

From HM Revenue & Customs · National Insurance Manual

Where an employer’s mileage rate for business mileage for periods to 5 April 2002 was greater than the “up to 4,000 miles” HMRC Authorised Mileage Rate (AMR), the profit would normally have attracted a Class 1 NICs liability, see NIM05715.

Exceptionally, however, an employer may have paid a rate above the AMR and argued that they had evidence to support that the mileage rate they paid was an accurate reflection of the business expenses actually incurred by their employees in using their privately owned cars.

Where this was alleged, we would have checked the evidence that the employer provided, considering the expenses rule contained in paragraph 3 and 9 of Part 8 of Schedule 3 to the 2001 Regulations, see NIM05020. If it was accepted that the mileage rate did no more than reimburse the employee the specific and distinct business expense incurred, there would have been no NICs liability on any part of the employer’s mileage rate.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms