Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Oil Taxation Manual

OT26000 · Capital allowances: research and development allowances

  • OT26001 · Introduction
  • OT26002 · Meaning of oil & gas exploration and appraisal
  • OT26005 · Judicial Comment on Scientific Research and Oil Exploration
  • OT26007 · Joint memorandum of 1967
  • OT26008 · 1967 Memorandum - Details
  • OT26009 · 1967 Memorandum - Successive Stages of Work - Stages 1 & 2
  • OT26010 · 1967 Memorandum - Successive Stages of Work - Stages 3, 4 &5
  • OT26013 · Tribunal reform of 01 April 2009
  • OT26015 · HMRC view on the 1967 Memorandum
  • OT26016 · 1967 Memorandum - HMRC view on the Meaning of Field
  • OT26017 · 1967 Memorandum - HMRC view on exclusions
  • OT26018 · 1967 Memorandum - HMRC view on end of Stage 3
  • OT26026 · Using reserve reporting for deciding on the availability of RDAs
  • OT26027 · 1967 memorandum - gaps between stages 3 and 4 in oil exploration and development
  • OT26030 · RDA Claims during production operations
  • OT26035 · Commencement of Trade
  • OT26036 · Geographical Scope of Research and Development Allowances
  • OT26041 · US Oil & Gas Partnerships
  • OT26045 · The purchase of the results of past exploration work
  • OT26050 · Redeterminations and Unitisations
  • OT26052 · Disposal of a licence interest
  • OT26054 · Disposal of a licence for an undeveloped area
  • OT26056 · The allowance of certain drilling expenditure
  • OT26058 · Treatment of Payments for Production Licences
  • OT26060 · Farm-ins
  1. Capital allowances: research and development allowances: contents
  2. Capital Allowances: Research and Development Allowances: The purchase of the results of past exploration work

OT26045 | Capital Allowances: Research and Development Allowances: The purchase of the results of past exploration work

From HM Revenue & Customs · Oil Taxation Manual

CAA01\S439

Qualifying expenditure is defined at CAA01\S439(1) as capital expenditure incurred by a person on research & development (R&D) directly undertaken by him or on his behalf.

RDA will therefore not be available to the purchaser of the results of past exploration work. The expenditure will either not have been undertaken on behalf of the purchaser or the purchaser is not incurring the expenditure for the purpose of the extension of knowledge.

HMRC takes the view that R&D expenditure incurred by an operator on behalf of a consortium under a joint operating agreement is undertaken on behalf of all the parties. It is not seen as necessary that all the parties have an interest in the licence concerned. In contrast where a licence interest changes hands, the original R&D expenditure was not undertaken on behalf of the purchaser of the interest and RDA will not be available to the purchaser. Such “second hand exploration expenditure” may however be relieved under the MEA code.

HMRC takes a similar view with payments under “bottom hole” agreements. This is an agreement where a non-licensee makes a payment to the licensees for information regarding the results of drilling an exploration well. These payments are usually made when the drilling reaches “total depth”. If the agreement is made before drilling commences HMRC accepts that the R&D expenditure is incurred on behalf of the “bottom hole” contributor. If the agreement is not made until after the well is completed HMRC does not accept that the R&D expenditure is incurred on behalf of the “bottom hole” contributor. The payment may qualify for MEA.

In all cases it should be noted that the provisions in CAA01\S439(2) mean that RDA is not available on the same expenditure in respect of more than one trade.

The meaning of the term “undertaken by him or on his behalf” was considered in the case of Gaspet Ltd v Elliss 60TC91. The case considered the meaning of the expressions “directly”, “undertaken” and “on behalf of”.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms