Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Oil Taxation Manual

OT43000 · Non-residents working on the UK continental shelf: transfer pricing

  • OT43001 · Introduction
  • OT43060 · Interaction with double taxation treaties
  • OT43100 · Drilling operating structures
  • OT43110 · What is a rig?
  • OT43130 · Characteristics of a bareboat charter
  • OT43160 · Bareboat charter - rig market
  • OT43170 · Bareboat charter - types of day rates
  • OT43200 · Bareboat charter - day rates
  • OT43280 · Day rates - semi submersible v jack-ups
  • OT43300 · Bareboat charters - transfer pricing challenge
  • OT43320 · Determining the transfer price - approved methods
  • OT43330 · Bareboat charter - comparable uncontrolled price
  • OT43360 · Bareboat charter - resale price method
  • OT43380 · Bareboat charter - cost plus method
  • OT43400 · Bareboat charter - transactional net margin method
  • OT43450 · Bareboat charter - profit split method
  • OT43455 · Advance pricing agreements
  1. Non-residents working on the UK continental shelf: transfer pricing: contents
  2. Non-residents working on the UK continental shelf: transfer pricing: bareboat charter - comparable uncontrolled price

OT43330 | Non-residents working on the UK continental shelf: transfer pricing: bareboat charter - comparable uncontrolled price

From HM Revenue & Customs · Oil Taxation Manual

This is the first of the methods referred to in OT43320. The OECD Guidelines recognise that finding a comparable, uncontrolled price (CUP) provides the most direct and reliable means to apply the arm’s length principle.

However as rig contractors for the most part engage in transactions with related entities there are few third party comparisons available, although they are seen from time to time. In the absence of an open bareboat charter market there is little opportunity for companies to ascertain third party rates. Statements on behalf of a rig owner that rates are based on arms length comparisons are therefore examined critically and supporting evidence sought.

A drilling contract may give an idea of the way in which a day rate is made up as between the provision of the rig and the provision of drilling services. For example, it may have been necessary for the customer and the rig operator to break down the operating day rate to provide a basis for calculating escalation charges. Contracts should therefore be examined closely for any light they may throw upon the matter. However evidence must be interpreted with care since a notional break down of day rates may have been agreed by the customer as a matter of form only.

The rate which really matters to the customer is likely to be the global operating day rate rather than the way in which the operator chooses to apportion that figure internally.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms