SG24100 | Security for tax at risk of being unpaid: risk assessing cases: is security action necessary?
From HM Revenue & Customs · Securities Guidance
You may have potential securities cases referred to you from a number of sources, for example from Local Compliance intervention teams and Debt Management, or you may self-source cases using HMRC’s electronic systems.
Deciding whether a security intervention is necessary means
identifying an event such as non-payment or the failure to submit a return
determining if the event might result in a loss of revenue, for example because assets disappear before they can be used to satisfy the tax debt
considering any other circumstances that may mitigate the risk, for example the existence of substantial assets that might ultimately be converted to cash
then
assessing whether or not there is likely to be a loss of revenue if no security action is taken.
The following cases are potentially high-risk
multiple business failures (also known as phoenix traders), where the person concerned in the running of the business is connected with past failures to pay tax due, see SG24200
businesses that fail to pay tax on time where the factors set out in SG24300 apply
businesses run by “shadow” directors - undischarged bankrupts or persons otherwise disqualified from acting as directors, see SG24250
businesses run by persons convicted of tax fraud.
At all times you should consider the implications of cross-tax working when reviewing potential security cases.
If you decide that the case is not suitable for a security intervention, but there are other risks on the case, forward it to the team that can best address those risks.