Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Securities Guidance

SG24000 · Security for tax at risk of being unpaid: risk assessing cases

  • SG24100 · Is security action necessary?
  • SG24150 · The role of the Environmental Tax officer
  • SG24200 · Multiple business failures (phoenix traders)
  • SG24250 · How to spot a ‘shadow’ director
  • SG24275 · Tainted premises
  • SG24300 · Non-compliant businesses
  1. Security for tax at risk of being unpaid: risk assessing cases: contents
  2. Security for tax at risk of being unpaid: risk assessing cases: is security action necessary?

SG24100 | Security for tax at risk of being unpaid: risk assessing cases: is security action necessary?

From HM Revenue & Customs · Securities Guidance

You may have potential securities cases referred to you from a number of sources, for example from Local Compliance intervention teams and Debt Management, or you may self-source cases using HMRC’s electronic systems.

Deciding whether a security intervention is necessary means

  • identifying an event such as non-payment or the failure to submit a return

  • determining if the event might result in a loss of revenue, for example because assets disappear before they can be used to satisfy the tax debt

  • considering any other circumstances that may mitigate the risk, for example the existence of substantial assets that might ultimately be converted to cash

then

  • assessing whether or not there is likely to be a loss of revenue if no security action is taken.

The following cases are potentially high-risk

  • multiple business failures (also known as phoenix traders), where the person concerned in the running of the business is connected with past failures to pay tax due, see SG24200

  • businesses that fail to pay tax on time where the factors set out in SG24300 apply

  • businesses run by “shadow” directors - undischarged bankrupts or persons otherwise disqualified from acting as directors, see SG24250

  • businesses run by persons convicted of tax fraud.

At all times you should consider the implications of cross-tax working when reviewing potential security cases.

If you decide that the case is not suitable for a security intervention, but there are other risks on the case, forward it to the team that can best address those risks.

Next
PrivacyTerms