Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Shares and Assets Valuation Manual

SVM113000 · The Statutory Open Market

  • SVM113010 · The Statutory Provisions
  • SVM113020 · General Comments on the Statutory Hypothesis
  • SVM113030 · Case Law - Introduction
  • SVM113040 · Case Law - Share Transfer Restrictions
  • SVM113050 · Case Law - Nature of transaction and available information
  • SVM113060 · Case Law - the Purchaser
  • SVM113070 · Case Law - the Special Purchaser
  • SVM113080 · Case Law - the Vendor
  • SVM113090 · Case Law - Marketing and the Property
  • SVM113100 · Case Law - Information Standards
  • SVM113110 · Case Law - evidence of transactions and agreements
  • SVM113120 · Case Law - Hindsight
  • SVM113130 · Case Law - Valuation decisions reached in particular cases
  • SVM113140 · Case Law - Shareholders' / family agreements
  • SVM113150 · Case Law - issues surrounding liquidity in shares
  1. The Statutory Open Market: Contents
  2. The Statutory Open Market: Case Law - Hindsight

SVM113120 | The Statutory Open Market: Case Law - Hindsight

From HM Revenue & Customs · Shares and Assets Valuation Manual

In S Patrick Erdal v HMRC [2011] UKFTT 87 TC the Tribunal Judge J Gordon Reid Q.C., F.C.I.Arb said:

“It is also an accepted principle of valuation that the valuer stands at the valuation date looking forward into the future with reasonable foresight, rather than looking back today with hindsight at the valuation date. However, regard may be had to later events for the purpose only of deciding what forecasts could reasonably have been made on 31 March 1982. The question of reasonable foresight is of particular importance in this appeal when coupled with the statutory direction to assume that the prospective purchaser has all the information which a prudent prospective purchaser might reasonably require if he were proposing to buy from a willing seller by private bargain at arm’s length.”

Additional Guidance: SVM150000

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms