Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Technical Teams Operational Guidance

TTOG11900 · Civil Investigation of Fraud (Code 9): historical record: penalties and settlement of cases

  • TTOG11910 · Report to authorising officer: basis of settlement
  • TTOG11920 · ‘New Penalties’ and ‘Old Penalties’
  • TTOG11925 · Civil Investigation of Fraud (Code 9): historical record: 'New Penalties': Disclosure Reduction where Disclosure Report not made
  • TTOG11930 · Settlement
  1. Civil Investigation of Fraud (Code 9): historical record: penalties and settlement of cases: contents
  2. Civil Investigation of Fraud (Code 9): historical record: penalties and settlement of cases: settlement

TTOG11930 | Civil Investigation of Fraud (Code 9): historical record: penalties and settlement of cases: settlement

From HM Revenue & Customs · Technical Teams Operational Guidance

Where agreement is reached without formal proceedings, direct tax cases are normally settled through a voluntary contract settlement, whereas indirect tax cases are finalised by raising formal assessments of tax - different procedures are then enacted to pursue and collect the debts.

In ‘contested’ cases, there are also great differences in approach in terms of assessment time limits, appeals and debt recovery procedures. Some of these differences are being resolved by the Powers Review, but others remain.

These differences do not make HMRC’s actions improper or unlawful. Therefore, existing settlement procedures should be used as appropriate for direct taxes and indirect taxes.

Previous
PrivacyTerms