Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Technical Teams Operational Guidance

TTOG13100 · Code 9 cases registered prior to 1/9/05 (Hansard): general: Historical Record

  • TTOG13110 · Background to Hansard procedure
  • TTOG13120 · Changes to the Hansard procedure following the Regina v Gill and Gill judgement July 2003
  • TTOG13130 · Are Hansard cases criminal investigations
  • TTOG13140 · Hansard cases in Scotland and Northern Ireland
  • TTOG13150 · CPIA and Hansard investigations
  • TTOG13160 · Hansard and the Human Rights Act
  • TTOG13170 · The significance of the Hansard Statement
  • TTOG13180 · Code of Practice 9 replaces other leaflets and codes
  1. Code 9 cases registered prior to 1/9/05 (Hansard): general: Historical Record: contents
  2. Code 9 cases registered prior to 1/9/05 (Hansard): general: Historical Record: Hansard and the Human Rights Act

TTOG13160 | Code 9 cases registered prior to 1/9/05 (Hansard): general: Historical Record: Hansard and the Human Rights Act

From HM Revenue & Customs · Technical Teams Operational Guidance

It may appear that offering an inducement (which is what the Hansard statement amounts to) in a caution interview is a contradiction and against the Human Rights Act.

Lord Hutton in R v Allen said “to the extent that there was any inducement contained in the Hansard statement, the inducement was to give true and accurate information to the Revenue”. We would not be able to use true and accurate information given in response to Hansard as evidence upon which to prosecute (indeed if the confession is full then no prosecution would follow). We can however use false information or lies given by the taxpayer in response to Hansard as evidence.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms