Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Business/Non-Business Manual

VBNB70000 · Legal history

  • VBNB72050 · Cases about the business test
  • VBNB72200 · Cases about direct link between supplies and consideration
  • VBNB72300 · Cases about operating in a commercial market
  • VBNB72400 · Cases about section 94(2) activities
  • VBNB72500 · Cases about non-taxed transactions and apportionment
  • VBNB72600 · Cases about taxable persons with more than one activity
  • VBNB72700 · Cases about having a profit motive
  • VBNB72800 · Cases about disposal of private assets
  • VBNB72900 · Cases about the purchase or sale of shares for investment purposes
  • VBNB73500 · Cases about retrospective changes of method
  • VBNB74100 · Cases about office holders
  • VBNB74200 · Cases about disposal of assets
  • VBNB74400 · Cases about museums and galleries
  • VBNB74600 · Cases about boat and aircraft hire
  • VBNB75800 · Cases about jockey’s riding fees
  • VBNB75920 · Cases about clubs and associations
  • VBNB75940 · Cases about club members’ facilities or advantages
  • VBNB75960 · Cases about apportionment and valuation of membership supplies
  • VBNB75990 · Cases about wildlife trusts
  1. Legal history: contents
  2. Legal history: cases about jockey’s riding fees

VBNB75800 | Legal history: cases about jockey’s riding fees

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Business/Non-Business Manual

Hodges (RJ&AS) 2000 STC 262

Please note that the following material is not a full summary of the case - it merely highlights the principle referred to in the appropriate section of this manual.

Hodges (RJ&AS) 2000 STC 262

A couple carried on business as racehorse trainers. They arranged for the apprentice and conditional jockeys employed by them at their stables to ride in races.

HMRC assessed for output tax on the basis that the trainers were supplying the services of the apprentice and conditional owners to the owners. The trainers argued that the jockeys should be treated as self-employed and were supplying their own services directly to the owners.

The Court held that regard should be given to the fact that the apprentice and conditional jockeys were answerable to the trainers. The Court also observed that because jockeys who have ridden out their weight allowances are self-employed it does not necessarily follow that that apprentice and conditional jockeys were also self-employed.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms