Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Clothing

VCLOTHING4000 · The design test - is the article designed for young children?

  • VCLOTHING4050 · The design test-is the article designed for young children?: General
  • VCLOTHING4100 · Garments which may be zero-rated irrespective of size
  • VCLOTHING4150 · Garments which may be standard-rated irrespective of size
  • VCLOTHING4200 · Maximum Clothing Measurements
  • VCLOTHING4250 · Body Measurements
  • VCLOTHING4300 · Advice on how to measure garments
  • VCLOTHING4350 · What to do if an article is suitable for older persons
  • VCLOTHING4400 · Legal Context
  • VCLOTHING4450 · Tribunal Rulings that support our policy
  • VCLOTHING4500 · The design test-is the article designed for young children?: Headgear
  • VCLOTHING4550 · Riding hats
  • VCLOTHING4600 · The design test-is the article designed for young children?: Style Considerations
  1. The design test - is the article designed for young children?: contents
  2. The design test-is the article designed for young children?: Style Considerations

VCLOTHING4600 | The design test-is the article designed for young children?: Style Considerations

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Clothing

In a minority of cases, you may need to consider whether there are factors inherent in the garment which make it suitable for older persons. If this applies, a garment which is within the maximum measurements could nevertheless be standard-rated.

In the Tribunal of Walter Stewart Ltd (MAN/73/29), a leather coat which did not exceed the maximum measurements was nevertheless ruled to be suitable for older persons. This was firstly because it was a relatively high-cost fashion garment, and would thus be more likely to appeal to adults, and secondly because a three-inch bust dart had been inserted.

It is unlikely the reverse will apply, as the ‘cut-off’ age for zero-rating is only 14 - and it will be rare for an article of clothing exceeding the maximum size limits allowed in VAT Notice714 to be too impossibly juvenile in style for a 14-year old to wear. However, you may wish to consider the tribunal ruling in Benrose Ltd t/a Multi-Stock Company (LON/98/7048) as outlined in VCLOTHING4500.

Previous
PrivacyTerms