Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Fraud

VATF45200 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: company officer liability

  • VATF45210 · Scope
  • VATF45220 · Engagement
  • VATF45230 · Amounts
  • VATF45240 · Mitigation
  • VATF45250 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: publication of details
  • VATF45270 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: assessment
  • VATF45280 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: when to assess
  • VATF45290 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: assessment time limits
  • VATF45300 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: appeal rights
  • VATF45310 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: processing the penalty
  • VATF45320 · Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: raising a penalty when the assessment is out of time
  1. Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: company officer liability: contents
  2. Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: when to assess

VATF45280 | Basic interventions: matters to consider when determining whether to use a civil intervention: assessments and penalties: raising penalties in particular circumstances: when to assess

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Fraud

In general, you should aim to issue the penalty at the same time as the knowledge principle (for example, Kittel or Mecsek) decision. Both notices can be sent at the same time.

There may be rare occasions when it is expedient to delay issuing the penalty. One example might be when a knowledge principle decision is approved in advance as suitable for the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. In these circumstances it may be desirable to await meeting with the trader as part of the ADR process before determining HMRC’s position on the penalty. The reason for this is that the ADR may entail new arguments being put forward or further evidence being furnished by the business. It is right that HMRC considers these points before issuing any penalty.

Any company officer liability notice can only be issued after the officer has been given a chance to make representations. Therefore, this notice will usually follow some time after the penalty assessment. But the same time limit applies, see VATF45290.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms