Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Fraud

VATF53400 · The Kittel principle intervention: Kittel in more detail: What is meant by ‘knew or should have known’

  • VATF53405 · Introduction
  • VATF53410 · The meaning of 'knew or should have known' in relation to corporate entities
  • VATF53415 · Actual knowledge
  • VATF53420 · Extent of what a taxable person 'should have known'
  • VATF53425 · The only reasonable explanation
  • VATF53430 · General awareness
  • VATF53435 · Contrivance
  • VATF53440 · Reliance of a taxable person on a 'third party'
  1. The Kittel principle intervention: Kittel in more detail: What is meant by ‘knew or should have known’: Contents
  2. The Kittel principle intervention: Kittel in more detail: What is meant by ‘knew or should have known’: Actual knowledge

VATF53415 | The Kittel principle intervention: Kittel in more detail: What is meant by ‘knew or should have known’: Actual knowledge

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Fraud

Rarely will direct and explicit evidence be available that the taxable person knew he was involved in a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT. However, actual knowledge may be inferred from a range of circumstantial evidence about the way in which the transactions have taken place that the taxable person ‘must have known’ that his transactions were ‘connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT’.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms