Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Relief for Disabled People Manual

VRDP04000 · Definitions and use of terms

  • VRDP04100 · Meaning and use of the term ‘disabled person'
  • VRDP04200 · Meaning of ‘chronically sick’
  • VRDP04300 · Meaning of ‘disabled’
  • VRDP04400 · Recipient of the supply
  • VRDP04500 · Group 15 relief and ‘use’ criteria
  1. Definitions and use of terms: contents
  2. Definitions and use of terms: meaning and use of the term ‘disabled person'

VRDP04100 | Definitions and use of terms: meaning and use of the term ‘disabled person'

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Relief for Disabled People Manual

Meaning

‘Disabled person’ is defined in Legal Note 3 to Group 12 of Schedule 8 of the VAT Act 1994 as follows:

Any person who is chronically sick or disabled is ‘disabled’ for the purposes of this Group.

It is a fairly wide definition, covering many of those who are sick as well as those who are disabled.

Use in VAT law

A concept common to the majority of Group 12 is that the goods or services must be supplied:

  • to ‘a disbabled person’; or

  • to an eligible charity which serves the needs of disabled people

for zero-rating to apply.

However, in items 2(g), 2(h) and 2(i), a condition of zero-rating is that the goods must be:

  • ‘designed solely for use by a disabled person’; or

  • ‘designed or substantially and permanently adapted for use by disabled persons’.

In this context, the term ‘disabled person’ becomes important as a means of judging whether the goods themselves qualify for zero-rating, and further guidance as to how to make this judgement can be found under the third, fourth and fifth subheadings of VRDP38000.

Tribunal cases

AppealDecision
Aquakraft Ltd (2214)The Tribunal was not prepared to accept that a person was chronically sick or disabled simply by having a slipped disc.
Posturite (UK) Ltd (7848)The Tribunal accepted that otherwise able bodied persons suffering from neck or back pain did not qualify as chronically sick or disabled.
G D Searle & Co Ltd (13439)The Tribunal found that whilst asthma was undoubtedly a serious health problem, that did not mean that all 3 million sufferers were ‘chronically sick or disabled’. On that basis, an aerosol spray for killing off dust mites was ruled ineligible for zero-rating.
Next
PrivacyTerms