Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Single Entity and Disaggregation

VATDSAG08000 · Useful legal decisions

  • VATDSAG08050 · High Court and Above: Richard Burrell
  • VATDSAG08100 · Tribunal: Useful legal decisions: husband and wife cases: Stephen and Angela Trippitt
  • VATDSAG08150 · Tribunal: Useful legal decisions: husband and wife cases: Sea Breeze Cafe
  • VATDSAG08200 · Tribunal: husband and wife cases: Salmon Tail
  • VATDSAG08250 · Tribunal: husband and wife cases: P&V Leonidas
  • VATDSAG08300 · Tribunal: Surreal Hair
  • VATDSAG08350 · Tribunal: RE Newton
  • VATDSAG08400 · Tribunal: R Wallace
  1. Useful legal decisions: contents
  2. Useful legal decisions: Tribunal: R Wallace

VATDSAG08400 | Useful legal decisions: Tribunal: R Wallace

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Single Entity and Disaggregation

In R Wallace (LON/2000/0599) VTD 17109, we argued that the appellants - who ran a public house - were a single entity. In the opinion of the Tribunal, there were two separate entities of

  • a sole proprietor supplying wet sales, and

  • a second sole proprietor providing catering.

Despite substantial evidence indicating a single business, the Tribunal placed considerable weight on the traders’ intention when reaching its decision. It also mentioned in its decision that, where there is a formal relationship between the parties, there may be an acceptable level of informality between the businesses.

This decision clarifies that public perception carries little weight when deciding whether there is only one business.

Previous
PrivacyTerms