Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Legislation
Income Tax Act 2007

Crossheading Charge where power to enjoy income

  • Section 720 Charge to tax on income treated as arising under section 721
  • Section 720A Transfers by closely-held companies
  • Section 721 Individuals with power to enjoy income as a result of relevant transactions
  • Section 721A Meaning of “protected foreign-source income” in section 721
  • Section 721B Section 721A: tainting
  • Section 722 When an individual has power to enjoy income of person abroad
  • Section 723 The enjoyment conditions
  • Section 724 Special rules where benefit provided out of income of person abroad
  • Section 725 Reduction in amount charged where controlled foreign company involved
  • Section 725A Recovery of tax paid as a result of section 721
  • Section 726 Qualifying new residents and remittance-basis users: “foreign” deemed income
  1. Charge where power to enjoy income
  2. Transfers by closely-held companies

Section 720A | Transfers by closely-held companies

From legislation.gov.uk

(1)The charge under section 720 also applies for the purpose of preventing the avoiding of a liability to taxation by means of a relevant transfer carried out by a closely-held company in which an individual has a qualifying interest.

(2)But the charge only applies in those circumstances if—

(a)the individual is involved in the company, and

(b)the avoidance condition is met.

(3)An individual has a qualifying interest in a closely-held company if the individual, or a nominee of the individual, is a participator in—

(a)the closely-held company, or

(b)the first closely-held company in a chain of two or more closely-held companies where each company in the chain is a participator in the next company in the chain, of which one such company is the closely-held company that carried out the relevant transfer.

(4)For the purposes of this section, an individual with a qualifying interest in a company is to be treated as being involved in the company unless the individual satisfies an officer of Revenue and Customs that neither the individual nor (in a case where the individual is not the relevant participator) the relevant participator has any direct or indirect involvement in the decision making of the company.

(5)The avoidance condition is met if—

(a)the relevant participator did not object to the making of the relevant transfer, and

(b)it is reasonable to draw the conclusion, from all the circumstances of the case, that the relevant participator was aware, or ought reasonably to have been aware—

(i)of the transfer, and

(ii)that one of the direct or indirect consequences of the transfer is the avoidance of a liability to taxation.

(6)For the purposes of subsections (4) and (5) the “relevant participator” means—

(a)in a case where the individual’s qualifying interest arises as a result of a nominee of the individual being a participator in a company, the nominee, or

(b)otherwise, the individual.

(7)Any arrangements to secure that a person has no direct or indirect involvement in the decision making of a company are to be disregarded if the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements is to secure that the condition in subsection (2)(a) is not met.

(8)Any arrangements that would result in the avoidance condition not being met are to be disregarded if the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements is to secure that the avoidance condition is not met.

(9)In this section—

“arrangements” include any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not legally enforceable);

“taxation” has the meaning it has in section 737.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms