Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM40100 · Specific receipts: compensation and damages

  • BIM40101 · Introduction
  • BIM40105 · Is it a trade receipt?
  • BIM40110 · Capital or revenue: summary
  • BIM40115 · Tangible assets fixed capital
  • BIM40120 · Intangible assets
  • BIM40125 · Other than trading contracts
  • BIM40130 · Reimbursement of trading expenses
  • BIM40135 · Loss of office: in course of trade or profession
  • BIM40140 · Loss of office: exceptions
  1. Specific receipts: compensation and damages: contents
  2. Specific receipts: compensation and damages: intangible assets

BIM40120 | Specific receipts: compensation and damages: intangible assets

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

S5 Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005, S35 Corporation Tax Act 2009

Trading contracts

The normal situation

Ordinarily, an amount received by a trader in consideration of the cancellation, breach or variation of a trading contract will be a revenue receipt. For example:

  • compensation and damages relating to a contract for the purchase or sale of trading stock or consumables (Short Bros Ltd v CIR [1927] 12 TC 955, see BIM35600; George Thompson & Co Ltd v CIR [1927] 12 TC 1091; Green v J Gliksten & Son Ltd [1929] 14 TC 364; Bush, Beach & Gent Ltd v Road [1939] 22 TC 519; Creed v H & M Levinson Ltd [1981] 54 TC 477)

  • if business is carried on by operating as agent for a number of manufacturers and the receipt is referable to one such contract (Kelsall Parsons & Co v CIR [1938] 21 TC 608 (see BIM35530); CIR v Fleming & Co (Machinery) Ltd [1951] 33 TC 57; CIR v David C MacDonald & Co [1955] 36 TC 388; Wiseburgh v Domville [1956] 36 TC 527; Fleming v Bellow Machine Co Ltd [1965] 42 TC 308; Elson v James G Johnston Ltd [1965] 42 TC 545)

Exception

Exceptionally, the receipt may be properly viewed as capital in nature if the compensation refers to one contract which:

  • is so dominant that its loss accounts for substantially the whole of the company’s trade (see Barr, Crombie & Co Ltd v CIR [1945] 26 TC 406, BIM35530)), or

  • regulates the whole structure or framework of the trade (see Van den Berghs Ltd v Clark [1935] 19 TC 390, BIM35530; Sabine v Lookers Ltd [1958] 38 TC 120)

If the receipt is capital in nature, the liability to Capital Gains Tax (in the case of unincorporated businesses) or Corporation Tax on chargeable gains (in the case of companies) needs to be considered.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms