Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM43100 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): overview

  • BIM43101 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): introduction
  • BIM43110 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): accruals
  • BIM43115 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - scope
  • BIM43120 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - Terrorism Act
  • BIM43125 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - Bribery Act
  • BIM43126 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): Criminal payments: bribery convictions
  • BIM43130 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - handling of cases
  • BIM43160 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - overview
  • BIM43165 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - territorial limitations
  • BIM43170 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - no criminal intent necessary
  • BIM43175 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - alternative basis for disallowance
  • BIM43180 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - examples
  • BIM43185 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - handling of cases
  1. Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): overview: contents
  2. Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - handling of cases

BIM43185 | Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - handling of cases

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

You should only raise the possible disallowance of an expense on the grounds that it is induced by blackmail or extortion if you find clear signs that it may be such a payment.

A disallowance on the ground that a payment was induced by blackmail or extortion may be easier to establish than a disallowance for a criminal payment (BIM43115 onwards). This is because payments induced by blackmail or extortion generally do not involve a criminal offence by the payer and so it may be easier to obtain agreement that a disallowance is due even when the blackmailer is not brought to justice. However, in some cases, similar problems of proof could arise. For example, the payer may argue that payments were for ’security' services and no blackmail threat was made.

Seek advice from Business Profits at an early stage if you are not sure whether a payment was induced by a blackmail offence under UK law.

Previous
PrivacyTerms