Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Business Income Manual

BIM43100 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): overview

  • BIM43101 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): introduction
  • BIM43110 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): accruals
  • BIM43115 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - scope
  • BIM43120 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - Terrorism Act
  • BIM43125 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - Bribery Act
  • BIM43126 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): Criminal payments: bribery convictions
  • BIM43130 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): criminal payments - handling of cases
  • BIM43160 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - overview
  • BIM43165 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - territorial limitations
  • BIM43170 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - no criminal intent necessary
  • BIM43175 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - alternative basis for disallowance
  • BIM43180 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - examples
  • BIM43185 · Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - handling of cases
  1. Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): overview: contents
  2. Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - no criminal intent necessary

BIM43170 | Specific deductions: crime (expenditure involving): blackmail and extortion - no criminal intent necessary

From HM Revenue & Customs · Business Income Manual

For a payment to be disallowed as induced by blackmail or extortion, there is no requirement for any criminal intention or criminal act on the part of the payer - the blackmail victim. It is sufficient that the expenditure was induced by a criminal threat. That threat itself will be a criminal act on the part of the blackmailer or extortionist but the payer will be doing no more than succumbing, willingly or not, to the pressure of the threat.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms