Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Capital Gains Manual

CG17480P · Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350 to CG17462

  • CG17480 · Indexation: example: asset acquired before 6/4/65
  • CG17481 · Indexation: example: part-disposal
  • CG17482 · Indexation: example: small part-disposal
  • CG17483 · Indexation: example
  • CG17484 · Indexation: example: wasting assets/assets derived from other assets
  • CG17489 · Indexation: example: indexation and gifts hold-over relief
  • CG17491 · Indexation: example: assets held at 31 March 1982
  • CG17510 · Indexation: example: capital allowances equal the unadjusted loss
  • CG17513 · Indexation: example: sale and leaseback
  • CG17514 · Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350-17462: meaning of allowances that may be given
  • CG17515 · Indexation: example: asset held at 31 March 1982
  • CG17516 · Indexation: example: capital allowances exceed value on 31/3/82
  • CG17517 · Indexation: example: chattel exemption and capital allowances
  1. Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350 to CG17462: contents
  2. Indexation: example: wasting assets/assets derived from other assets

CG17484 | Indexation: example: wasting assets/assets derived from other assets

From HM Revenue & Customs · Capital Gains Manual

In his will Mr K, who died on 1 February 1983, left the film rights in a novel to his daughter Miss L, and the rest of the copyright to his son Mr M. the respective probate values were £50,000 and £35,000.

1 January 1987 Miss L acquired the rest of the copyright from Mr M for £60,000. This was a transaction between connected persons, and Shares and Assets Valuation, see CG68300, advised that the value was £80,000.

1 January 1992 Miss L sold the (entire) copyright for £200,000. The copyright is a wasting asset as it will cease to exist on 31 December 2033.

Mr M’s computation is

----£
--Market value on sale-80,000
Less-probate value35,000-
--wasted 3/502,100-
-Wasted cost--32,900
--Unindexed gain-47,100
LessIndexation32,900-6,744
--INDEXED GAIN-40,356

For Miss L TCGA92/S43 applies because the value of the copyright in her hands is partly derived from the film rights which she had previously. Once she had the copyright as a whole, the film rights as a separate asset ceased to exist. Her computation is:-

----£
-Disposal proceeds--200,000
LessCosts---
-Probate value50,000--
-less wasted 8/508,00042,000-
-Market value80,000--
-less wasted 5/478,51071,490113,490
--Unindexed gain-86,510
LessIndexation113,490 x 0.356-40,402
--INDEXED GAIN-46,402

Indexation runs on BOTH items of allowable expenditure from 1 January 1987. (If on the other hand Mr M had paid his sister to surrender her film rights, indexation would have run on the copyright from the date of Mr K’s death as acquisition costs, and on the market value of the film rights from the date of surrender as enhancement expenditure.)

There are examples demonstrating the case where a leaseholder buys the freehold at CG71420 - CG71423.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms