Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Capital Gains Manual

CG17480P · Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350 to CG17462

  • CG17480 · Indexation: example: asset acquired before 6/4/65
  • CG17481 · Indexation: example: part-disposal
  • CG17482 · Indexation: example: small part-disposal
  • CG17483 · Indexation: example
  • CG17484 · Indexation: example: wasting assets/assets derived from other assets
  • CG17489 · Indexation: example: indexation and gifts hold-over relief
  • CG17491 · Indexation: example: assets held at 31 March 1982
  • CG17510 · Indexation: example: capital allowances equal the unadjusted loss
  • CG17513 · Indexation: example: sale and leaseback
  • CG17514 · Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350-17462: meaning of allowances that may be given
  • CG17515 · Indexation: example: asset held at 31 March 1982
  • CG17516 · Indexation: example: capital allowances exceed value on 31/3/82
  • CG17517 · Indexation: example: chattel exemption and capital allowances
  1. Introduction and computation: indexation: examples for CG17350 to CG17462: contents
  2. Indexation: example: assets held at 31 March 1982

CG17491 | Indexation: example: assets held at 31 March 1982

From HM Revenue & Customs · Capital Gains Manual

12 March 1979 X buys a field for £100,000.

31 March 1982 value is £85,000.

12 March 1989 X sells field for £80,000.

---£
-Disposal proceeds-80,000
-Value 31.3.82-85,000
-Unindexed loss-(5,000)
LessIndexation100,000 x 0.41440,400
---(46,400)

It is clear that the kink test, using the greater original cost of £100,000, will give a greater loss than rebasing does. This is the most common instance after 31 March 1982 of indexation and cost being based on different figures apart from those no gain/no loss situations to which rebasing does not apply.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms