Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Capital Gains Manual

CG40240P · Companies and Groups of Companies: Administration: Capital loss anti-avoidance rule

  • CG40240 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: General
  • CG40241 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Effect of the legislation and commencement
  • CG40242 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Definition of arrangements
  • CG40243 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule - Definition of tax advantage
  • CG40244 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Is a tax advantage a main purpose?
  • CG40245 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Tax advantage - choice of commercial options
  • CG40247 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Choice of commercial options
  • CG40248 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Interaction with negligible value claims
  • CG40249 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Time of use of losses immaterial
  • CG40250 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Company to which tax advantage arises
  • CG40251 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: The tiering effect
  • CG40252 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Example 1
  • CG40253 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Example 2
  • CG40254 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Example 3
  • CG40255 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Example 4
  • CG40240A · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: general
  • CG40240B · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: general
  • CG40246 · Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Tax advantage - choice of commercial options
  1. Companies and Groups of Companies: Administration: Capital loss anti-avoidance rule
  2. Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Definition of arrangements

CG40242 | Capital loss anti-avoidance rule: Definition of arrangements

From HM Revenue & Customs · Capital Gains Manual

The term “arrangements” is widely drawn to include any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions, whether or not legally enforceable.

Whether a transaction forms part of a series of transactions, or a scheme, or arrangements in general a question of fact, but this conclusion will follow in any case where one transaction would not have taken place without another transaction, or would have taken place on different terms without that other transaction. However, it is not necessary that transactions must depend on each other in this way in order that they form part of a scheme or arrangements.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms