Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Compliance Handbook

CH81100 · Penalties for Inaccuracies: Types of inaccuracy

  • CH81110 · The four types of inaccuracy
  • CH81120 · What is reasonable care
  • CH81122 · What is reasonable care - inaccuracies relating to avoidance arrangements
  • CH81123 · What is reasonable care - disqualified advice relating to avoidance arrangements
  • CH81124 · What is reasonable care - avoidance arrangements
  • CH81125 · Reliance on another person
  • CH81130 · Inaccuracy despite taking reasonable care
  • CH81131 · Inaccuracy despite taking reasonable care no penalty due - Examples
  • CH81140 · Careless Inaccuracy
  • CH81141 · Correction of errors for indirect taxes
  • CH81142 · Correction of errors for indirect taxes - monetary limits
  • CH81143 · Correction of errors for indirect taxes reasonable steps to notify - examples
  • CH81145 · Examples of careless inaccuracy
  • CH81150 · Deliberate but not concealed inaccuracy
  • CH81151 · Examples of deliberate but not concealed inaccuracy
  • CH81160 · Deliberate and concealed inaccuracy
  • CH81161 · Examples of deliberate and concealed
  • CH81165 · Inaccuracy attributable to another person
  • CH81166 · Actions of another person
  • CH81167 · Actions of another person supplying or withholding information
  • CH81168 · Intentions of another person - Examples
  • CH81170 · Under- assessment by HMRC
  • CH81180 · Onus of proof
  • CH81190 · Level of proof
  • CH81195 · Quality of evidence: poor co-operation
  1. Penalties for Inaccuracies: Types of inaccuracy: contents
  2. Penalties for Inaccuracies: Types of inaccuracy: Level of proof

CH81190 | Penalties for Inaccuracies: Types of inaccuracy: Level of proof

From HM Revenue & Customs · Compliance Handbook

You must check the date from which these rules apply for the tax or duty you are dealing with. See CH81011 for full details.

You must always clearly establish why a penalty is due from the facts.

The standard of proof is the balance of probabilities. This means that on the evidence, it is more probable than not that the inaccuracy was made carelessly or deliberately.

Whilst this is the case whether the inaccuracy is careless or deliberate, the quality of evidence should be higher for the more serious behaviour.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms