Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Corporate Intangibles Research and Development Manual

CIRD63230 · Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors

  • CIRD63235 · Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors: Payments to an unconnected sub-contractor - on or after 1 April 2009
  • CIRD63240 · Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors: Payment to a connected sub-contractor - on or after 1 April 2009
  • CIRD63245 · Payments to a connected sub-contractor - relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor
  • CIRD63250 · Payments to an unconnected sub-contractor - on or before 31 March 2009
  • CIRD63255 · Payments to a connected sub-contractor: on or before 31 March 2009
  • CIRD63260 · Payments to a connected sub-contractor - relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor
  • CIRD63265 · Land Remediation Relief: Verification
  • CIRD63270 · Land Remediation Relief: Preliminaries
  1. Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors: Contents
  2. Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors: Payments to a connected sub-contractor - relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor

CIRD63260 | Land Remediation Relief: Subcontractors: Payments to a connected sub-contractor - relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor

From HM Revenue & Customs · Corporate Intangibles Research and Development Manual

This section applies to expenditure incurred on or before 31 March 2009.

Relevant expenditure of the sub-contractor is expenditure that is incurred by the sub-contractor in carrying out the land remediation activities to which the sub-contractor payment relates, that is:

  • incurred on employee costs (see CIRD69005) and materials,

  • not of a capital nature, and

  • not subsidised (see CIRD63130).

If a sub-contractor, who is a connected party, in turn further sub-contracts work, then the payment to that sub-contractor does not qualify for relief.

Example

A Ltd engages the services of a connected party, B Ltd, to construct a new office building. B Ltd then engages the services of a specialist firm, C Ltd, to remove Japanese Knotweed from the site.

A Ltd cannot claim Land Remediation Relief in respect of the payment made by B Ltd to C Ltd. B Ltd cannot have relief because they are a subcontractor and it is A Ltd that bears the costs, see CIRD63140.

Had A Ltd engaged the services of the specialist firm, C Ltd, itself then it would have qualified for Land Remediation Relief.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms