Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
Customs Civil Penalties Guidance

CCPG27200 · Penalty notice: considering whether to issue a penalty notice

  • CCPG27210 · What is a penalty notice
  • CCPG27220 · The Customs Penalty Action Checklist
  • CCPG27230 · Checking whether we are within time limits for a penalty
  • CCPG27240 · Establishing who is to be penalised
  • CCPG27250 · Considering any previous action taken
  • CCPG27260 · Considering reasonable excuse
  • CCPG27270 · Considering overall whether a penalty is the best way of achieving compliance
  • CCPG27280 · Example of a decision to charge a penalty
  • CCPG27290 · Seeking advice from the PN301 Team
  1. Penalty notice: considering whether to issue a penalty notice: contents
  2. Penalty notice: considering whether to issue a penalty notice: considering overall whether a penalty is the best way of achieving compliance

CCPG27270 | Penalty notice: considering whether to issue a penalty notice: considering overall whether a penalty is the best way of achieving compliance

From HM Revenue & Customs · Customs Civil Penalties Guidance

Customs Civil Penalty (CCP) action and the issue of a penalty is only one of the tools we have available to encourage trader compliance. There are other options available. In deciding what action is likely to encourage trader compliance, we need to look at the trader’s compliance history.

For example

If the trader has previously received a Civil Penalty Warning Letter (CPWL) or a letter of written instruction for a similar contravention, issuing a penalty is probably the most appropriate course of action.

If the trader has received Civil Penalties for similar contraventions within the last two years, you need to consider their compliance history and decide whether a further penalty is likely to encourage compliance. If yes, then issue the penalty. If no, you should consider what other sanctions are likely to improve compliance.

If the trader has a history of persistent non-compliance and has received numerous civil penalties, you should consider what other sanctions are likely to improve compliance. You could consider recommending to the Approvals Team withdrawal of their usage of an approval or simplified regime.

You might also consider that a pattern of persistent non-compliance is actually evidence of evasion, in which case you should consider PN300 action, see CEP2050 {#} and the rest of that manual.

However, if the trader has a good compliance history and this contravention occurred in a particular regime they are new to, provision of education and advice which is confirmed in a letter of written instruction may be the most appropriate action.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms