Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
International Manual

INTM267730 · Foreign banks trading in the UK through permanent establishments: The approach in determining an adjustment to funding costs - STEP 2: Risk weighting the assets - the Basel II regulatory regime

  • INTM267731 · Foreign banks trading in the UK through permanent establishments: The approach in determining an adjustment to funding costs - STEP 2: Risk weighting the assets - Basel II regulatory regime: Step II under Basel II
  • INTM267732 · The three pillars
  • INTM267733 · Pillar 1
  • INTM267734 · Pillar 1 - credit risk
  • INTM267735 · Pillar 1 - the standardised approach to credit risk
  • INTM267736 · Pillar 1 - use of external credit assessment institutions
  • INTM267737 · Pillar 1 - Simplified standardised approach to credit risk
  • INTM267738 · Pillar 1 - internal rating based approaches to credit risk
  • INTM267739 · Types of internal rating based approaches to credit risk
  • INTM267740 · Pillar 1 - trading book issues including market risk
  • INTM267741 · Pillar 1 - operational risk
  • INTM267742 · Pillar 1 - the basic indicator approach to operational risk
  • INTM267743 · Pillar 1 - the standardised approach to operational risk
  • INTM267744 · Pillar 1 - the alternative standardised approach to
  • INTM267745 · Pillar 1 - advanced measurement approaches
  • INTM267746 · Pillar 2
  • INTM267747 · Implementation of Basel II
  • INTM267748 · The thin capitalisation principle
  • INTM267749 · The interim period
  • INTM267750 · Use of Basel II approaches
  • INTM267751 · Reporting
  • INTM267752 · Operational and Pillar 2 risk
  • INTM267753 · Risk assessment of UK branches of foreign banks
  • INTM267754 · End of the interim period
  • INTM267755 · Overseas branches of UK-resident banks
  1. Foreign banks trading in the UK through permanent establishments: The approach in determining an adjustment to funding costs - STEP 2: Risk weighting the assets - the Basel II regulatory regime: contents
  2. Foreign banks trading in the UK through permanent establishments: The approach in determining an adjustment to funding costs - STEP 2: Risk weighting the assets - the Basel II regulatory regime: Implementation of Basel II

INTM267747 | Foreign banks trading in the UK through permanent establishments: The approach in determining an adjustment to funding costs - STEP 2: Risk weighting the assets - the Basel II regulatory regime: Implementation of Basel II

From HM Revenue & Customs · International Manual

Member countries of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) implemented Basel II on various different dates. Canada, for example, applied it from November 2008 whereas the USA did not introduce it until 2010. Some non BIS members have implemented Basel II, others intend to implement it in the near future (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand January 2008, India January 2009, Indonesia January 2010) while others do not. Countries therefore fall into one of three categories:

  • those already implementing Basel II;

  • those intending to implement Basel II; and

  • those which will not implement Basel II.

A second matter to be taken into consideration is that individual banks will apply Basel II in different ways. Large banks will apply more sophisticated and costly frameworks e.g. an Internal Rating Based (IRB) approach for credit risk, Value at Risk (VaR) for market risk and Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA) for operational risk. Smaller banks will not incur the expense of sophisticated approaches and will veer towards standardised approaches.

It is possible that because different risk weighting frameworks are used, the risk weighting two banks would attach to similar assets may differ. For example, in less volatile times it is expected that more sophisticated approaches under Pillar 1 will result in less credit and market risk being attributed to assets because the risk can be more accurately identified than under Basel I and more standardised Basel II approaches. A reduction in the capital attributed to the branch may therefore occur and should be recognised if Steps 1 to 5 have been correctly applied using Basel II approaches.

The implications of the above are that the common methodology for risk weighting assets present under Basel I are present under Basel II. That being the case, a series of questions arises for tax purposes.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms