Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
International Manual

INTM489976 · Diverted Profits Tax: imposing a charge – procedure and governance

  • INTM489977 · Overview
  • INTM489978 · Identifying potential Diverted Profits Tax cases
  • INTM489979 · Time limits within the Diverted Profits Tax legislation
  • INTM489980 · Engagement during the review period
  • INTM489981 · Preliminary notice
  • INTM489982 · Representations following a preliminary notice
  • INTM489983 · Charging notice
  • INTM489984 · Process for collecting tax
  • INTM489985 · Review period
  • INTM489986 · Designating the end of the review period
  • INTM489987 · Supplementary charging notices and amending notices
  • INTM489988 · Bringing taxable diverted profits into charge to corporation tax
  • INTM489989 · Appeals against charging notices and supplementary charging notices
  • INTM489990 · Information and inspection powers
  • INTM489991 · Interaction with other legislation
  • INTM489992 · Governance
  1. Diverted Profits Tax: imposing a charge – procedure and governance: contents
  2. Diverted Profits Tax: imposing a charge – procedure and governance: interaction with other legislation

INTM489991 | Diverted Profits Tax: imposing a charge – procedure and governance: interaction with other legislation

From HM Revenue & Customs · International Manual

The General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR) applies to DPT. The GAAR should not be raised with a taxpayer or their advisors until Counter-Avoidance have been consulted and given their express approval.

The definition of tax advantage at CTA 2010 s1139 has been widened to include the avoidance or reduction of a charge to DPT. This means that various targeted anti-avoidance rules such as the loan relationship unallowable purpose rule at section 441 of CTA 2009 can apply in relation to DPT.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms