Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Fraud

VATF35500 · What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction

  • VATF35510 · The power to raise a penalty for non compliance
  • VATF35520 · Failure to comply with the NoD
  • VATF35530 · Failure to preserve the directed records
  • VATF35540 · Failure to produce the directed records
  • VATF35550 · Reasonable excuse
  • VATF35560 · Making a decision to raise and issue a penalty
  1. What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: contents
  2. What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: failure to comply with the NoD

VATF35520 | What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: failure to comply with the NoD

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Fraud

Failure to comply with a direction may render a taxable person liable to a penalty under section 69B of the VATA. Under section 69B(2) the penalty is £200 for each day of default up to a maximum of 30 days, commencing on the effective date as shown in the notice of direction.

When issuing a section 69B(2) letter (This content has been withheld because of exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000) should be used.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms