Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Fraud

VATF35500 · What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction

  • VATF35510 · The power to raise a penalty for non compliance
  • VATF35520 · Failure to comply with the NoD
  • VATF35530 · Failure to preserve the directed records
  • VATF35540 · Failure to produce the directed records
  • VATF35550 · Reasonable excuse
  • VATF35560 · Making a decision to raise and issue a penalty
  1. What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: contents
  2. What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: failure to preserve the directed records

VATF35530 | What to consider prior to determining whether to use an intervention: making and issuing a Notice of Direction: failure to comply with the direction: failure to preserve the directed records

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Fraud

Under section 69B(3), the penalty is £500 for a failure to preserve records that the Commissioners have directed to be kept (i.e. in cases where it can be shown that the records existed, but where the taxable person failed to retain them for the required period).

When issuing a section 69B(3) letter (This content has been withheld because of exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000) should be used.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms