Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Input Tax

VIT60000 · Legal history

  • VIT61080 · Cases about business purpose
  • VIT61250 · Cases about definition of input tax
  • VIT61330 · Cases about recipient of supply
  • VIT61360 · Cases about legal expenses
  • VIT61410 · Cases about sponsorship
  • VIT62100 · Cases about direct and immediate link
  • VIT62200 · Cases about intending traders
  • VIT62520 · Cases about mixed use of assets
  • VIT62540 · Cases about apportionment
  • VIT62560 · Cases about charges for private use
  • VIT63100 · Cases about evidence to claim input tax
  • VIT63200 · Cases about regulation 111
  • VIT64050 · Cases about holding companies
  • VIT64150 · Cases about domestic accommodation
  • VIT64300 · Cases about entertainment
  • VIT64380 · Cases about clothing
  • VIT64680 · Cases about motoring expenses
  • VIT64690 · Cases about private use of cars
  1. Legal history: contents
  2. Legal history: cases about direct and immediate link

VIT62100 | Legal history: cases about direct and immediate link

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Input Tax

BLP Group plc 1995 STC 424

Please note that the following material is not a full summary of the case - it merely highlights the principle referred to in the appropriate section of this manual.

BLP Group plc 1995 STC 424

A normally taxable holding company sold off one of its subsidiaries by selling its shares. They did this because the group as a whole was in financial difficulty and needed funds so that they could continue to trade.

The ultimate purpose of the sale, therefore, was so that the group could continue to trade. In particular the reason for the sale was so that BLP could continue to charge taxable management charges to its other subsidiaries. BLP sought to link the costs of the exempt share sale to this ultimate purpose and deduct them as directly attributable to those taxable management charges.

This case brought out several important concepts, all arising from fundamental EU VAT law. Firstly it highlighted the need for a direct and immediate link between an input supply and taxable outputs for there to be any entitlement to deduct. It highlighted the idea of a “chain breaking” exempt supply that stops VAT flowing through the chain of one business’s output tax being another business’s input tax until the final consumer is reached. Also it confirmed that, as VAT is a transaction-based tax, the ultimate purpose of a business is irrelevant so it is only the immediate supply to which any input is a cost component that matters.

Please also refer to the material on AB SKF at VIT64050.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms