Skip to content
Solved
SearchBrowse
Sign in

Contents

Official guidance
VAT Input Tax

VIT60000 · Legal history

  • VIT61080 · Cases about business purpose
  • VIT61250 · Cases about definition of input tax
  • VIT61330 · Cases about recipient of supply
  • VIT61360 · Cases about legal expenses
  • VIT61410 · Cases about sponsorship
  • VIT62100 · Cases about direct and immediate link
  • VIT62200 · Cases about intending traders
  • VIT62520 · Cases about mixed use of assets
  • VIT62540 · Cases about apportionment
  • VIT62560 · Cases about charges for private use
  • VIT63100 · Cases about evidence to claim input tax
  • VIT63200 · Cases about regulation 111
  • VIT64050 · Cases about holding companies
  • VIT64150 · Cases about domestic accommodation
  • VIT64300 · Cases about entertainment
  • VIT64380 · Cases about clothing
  • VIT64680 · Cases about motoring expenses
  • VIT64690 · Cases about private use of cars
  1. Legal history: contents
  2. Legal history: cases about intending traders

VIT62200 | Legal history: cases about intending traders

From HM Revenue & Customs · VAT Input Tax

Ghent Coal 1998 STC 260
Rompleman ECR 655

Please note that the following material is not a full summary of the case - it merely highlights the principle referred to in the appropriate section of this manual.

Ghent Coal 1998 STC 260

A company acquired land and started preparatory work so it was able to carry on its business. The local council forced the company to sell the land and with the sale went any prospect of the company fulfilling their business intention. The tax authorities sought to recover the input tax and the matter was referred to the CJEU.

The Court confirmed that the right to recover remains in circumstances where events beyond the control of the company cause the business to fail to fulfil its original intention.

Rompleman ECR 655

A couple acquired a future title to two showroom units that were being built. The showrooms were to be let to traders and so the couple opted to tax. The couple applied for refund of the input tax incurred before the units were let but this claim was initially refused on the grounds that no taxable supplies had yet been made.

The Court ruled that someone undertaking acts preparatory to the carrying on of an economic activity qualified as a taxable person. Input tax was recoverable because the purpose of the VAT deduction system was to relieve entirely the burden of VAT suffered in the course of a taxable person’s economic activities. Those activities included preparatory acts such as buying immoveable property.

PreviousNext
PrivacyTerms